pg.ddx.io  pgsql-performance@postgresql.org mailing list archive  
help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: Joshua Marsh <icub3d@gmail.com>
To: pgsql-performance@postgresql.org
Subject: Re: Hints proposal
Date: Thu, 12 Oct 2006 09:26:24 -0600
Message-ID: <38242de90610120826l5328759bt41468644e54badae@mail.gmail.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20061012151439.GT28647@nasby.net>
References: <20061012151439.GT28647@nasby.net>

On 10/12/06, Jim C. Nasby <jim@nasby.net> wrote:
>
> Posting here instead of hackers since this is where the thread got
> started...
>
> The argument has been made that producing a hints system will be as hard
> as actually fixing the optimizer. There's also been clamoring for an
> actual proposal, so here's one that (I hope) wouldn't be very difficult
> to implemen.
>
> My goal with this is to keep the coding aspect as simple as possible, so
> that implementation and maintenance of this isn't a big burden. Towards
> that end, these hints either tell the planner specifically how to handle
> some aspect of a query, or they tell it to modify specific cost
> estimates. My hope is that this information could be added to the
> internal representation of a query without much pain, and that the
> planner can then use that information when generating plans.


I've been following the last thread with a bit of interest.  I like the
proposal.  It seems simple and easy to use.  What is it about hinting that
makes it so easily breakable with new versions?  I don't have any experience
with Oracle, so I'm not sure how they screwed logic like this up.  Hinting
to use a specific merge or scan seems fairly straight forward; if the query
requests to use an index on a join, I don't see how hard it is to go with
the suggestion.  It will become painfully obvious to the developer if his
hinting is broken.

view thread (74+ messages)  latest in thread

Message-ID: <38242de90610120826l5328759bt41468644e54badae@mail.gmail.com>
Permalink:  ../38242de90610120826l5328759bt41468644e54badae@mail.gmail.com/
Also on:    postgresql.org/message-id/38242de90610120826l5328759bt41468644e54badae@mail.gmail.com

 · 

reply

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Reply to all the recipients using the --to and --cc options:
  reply via email

  To: pgsql-performance@postgresql.org
  Cc: icub3d@gmail.com
  Subject: Re: Hints proposal
  In-Reply-To: <38242de90610120826l5328759bt41468644e54badae@mail.gmail.com>

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

This inbox is served by DDX for PostgreSQL; see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox