From: Tom Lane <tgl@sss.pgh.pa.us>
To: Josh Berkus <josh@agliodbs.com>
Cc: pgsql-performance@postgresql.org, Mark Kirkwood <markir@paradise.net.nz>
Cc: Craig A. James <cjames@modgraph-usa.com>
Subject: Re: Simple join optimized badly?
Date: Mon, 09 Oct 2006 13:41:42 -0400
Message-ID: <4094.1160415702@sss.pgh.pa.us> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <200610091012.43855.josh@agliodbs.com>
References: <45274A77.7080005@modgraph-usa.com>
<4529C43A.3050503@paradise.net.nz>
<19817.1160369035@sss.pgh.pa.us>
<200610091012.43855.josh@agliodbs.com>
Josh Berkus <josh@agliodbs.com> writes:
> Unfortunately, EDB's solution is likely to be Oracle-based, which is
> liable to fall into the trap of "not good enough."
I'd be a bit worried about Oracle patents as well...
regards, tom lane
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Reply to all the recipients using the --to and --cc options:
reply via email
To: pgsql-performance@postgresql.org
Cc: tgl@sss.pgh.pa.us, josh@agliodbs.com, markir@paradise.net.nz, cjames@modgraph-usa.com
Subject: Re: Simple join optimized badly?
In-Reply-To: <4094.1160415702@sss.pgh.pa.us>
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
This inbox is served by DDX for PostgreSQL; see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox