pg.ddx.io  pgsql-performance@postgresql.org mailing list archive  

help / color / mirror / Atom feed

From: Tom Lane <tgl@sss.pgh.pa.us>
To: Greg Smith <gsmith@gregsmith.com>
Cc: pgsql-performance@postgresql.org
Subject: Re: SCSI vs SATA
Date: Fri, 06 Apr 2007 02:38:31 -0400
Message-ID: <411.1175841511@sss.pgh.pa.us> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <Pine.GSO.4.64.0704060205580.15433@westnet.com>
References: <HCEPKPMCAJLDGJIBCLGHMEMGHGAA.james@mansionfamily.plus.com>
	<19221.1175751146@sss.pgh.pa.us>
	<1175786370.9839.31.camel@state.g2switchworks.com>
	<E1HZUmO-0007bS-62@elasmtp-galgo.atl.sa.earthlink.net>
	<Pine.LNX.4.64.0704051312410.26199@asgard.lang.hm>
	<28551.1175839215@sss.pgh.pa.us>
	<Pine.GSO.4.64.0704060205580.15433@westnet.com>

Greg Smith <gsmith@gregsmith.com> writes:
> On Fri, 6 Apr 2007, Tom Lane wrote:
>> It seems hard to believe that the vendors themselves wouldn't burn in
>> the drives for half a day, if that's all it takes to eliminate a large
>> fraction of infant mortality.

> I've read that much of the damage that causes hard drive infant mortality 
> is related to shipping.

Doh, of course.  Maybe I'd better go to bed now...

			regards, tom lane

view thread (91+ messages)  latest in thread

Message-ID: <411.1175841511@sss.pgh.pa.us>
Permalink:  ../411.1175841511@sss.pgh.pa.us/
Also on:    postgresql.org/message-id/411.1175841511@sss.pgh.pa.us

copy link · copy postgr.es

reply

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Reply to all the recipients using the --to and --cc options:
  reply via email

  To: pgsql-performance@postgresql.org
  Cc: tgl@sss.pgh.pa.us, gsmith@gregsmith.com
  Subject: Re: SCSI vs SATA
  In-Reply-To: <411.1175841511@sss.pgh.pa.us>

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

This inbox is served by DDX for PostgreSQL; see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox