pg.ddx.io  pgsql-performance@postgresql.org mailing list archive  
help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: Kim Bisgaard <kib@dmi.dk>
To: Tom Lane <tgl@sss.pgh.pa.us>
Cc: pgsql-performance@postgresql.org
Subject: Re: full outer performance problem
Date: Wed, 11 May 2005 09:05:05 +0200
Message-ID: <4281AEA1.8020600@dmi.dk> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <10318.1115736342@sss.pgh.pa.us>
References: <428078E6.90007@dmi.dk>
	<10318.1115736342@sss.pgh.pa.us>

Sorry for not listing the exact layout of temp_XXXX:

obsdb=> \d temp_dry_at_2m
              Table "public.temp_dry_at_2m"
     Column     |            Type             | Modifiers
----------------+-----------------------------+-----------
 obshist_id     | integer                     | not null
 station_id     | integer                     | not null
 timeobs        | timestamp without time zone | not null
 temp_dry_at_2m | real                        | not null
Indexes:
    "temp_dry_at_2m_pkey" primary key, btree (obshist_id)
    "temp_dry_at_2m_idx" btree (station_id, timeobs)

The difference between the two queries is if a (station_id,timeobs) row 
is missing in one table, then the first returns one record(null,9.3) 
while the second return no records.

Regards,
Kim Bisgaard.

Tom Lane wrote:

>Kim Bisgaard <kib+pg@dmi.dk> writes:
>  
>
>>I have two BIG tables (virtually identical) with 3 NOT NULL columns 
>>Station_id, TimeObs, Temp_XXXX, with indexes on (Station_id, TimeObs) 
>>and valid ANALYSE (set statistics=100). I want to join the two tables 
>>with a FULL OUTER JOIN.
>>    
>>
>
>I'm confused.  If the columns are NOT NULL, why isn't this a valid
>transformation of your original query?
>
>  
>
>>select temp_max_60min,temp_dry_at_2m
>>from station s natural join
>>temp_dry_at_2m a full outer join temp_max_60min b using (station_id, timeobs)
>>where s.wmo_id=6065 
>>and _a.timeobs='2004-1-1 0:0:0' and b._timeobs='2004-1-1 0:0:0' 
>>and '2004-1-1 0:0:0' between s.startdate and s.enddate;
>>    
>>
>
>Seems like it's not eliminating any rows that would otherwise succeed.
>
>			regards, tom lane
>
>---------------------------(end of broadcast)---------------------------
>TIP 3: if posting/reading through Usenet, please send an appropriate
>      subscribe-nomail command to majordomo@postgresql.org so that your
>      message can get through to the mailing list cleanly
>
>  
>

-- 
Kim Bisgaard

Computer Department                  Phone: +45 3915 7562 (direct)
Danish Meteorological Institute      Fax: +45 3915 7460 (division)

view thread (12+ messages)  latest in thread

Message-ID: <4281AEA1.8020600@dmi.dk>
Permalink:  ../4281AEA1.8020600@dmi.dk/
Also on:    postgresql.org/message-id/4281AEA1.8020600@dmi.dk

 · 

reply

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Reply to all the recipients using the --to and --cc options:
  reply via email

  To: pgsql-performance@postgresql.org
  Cc: kib@dmi.dk, tgl@sss.pgh.pa.us
  Subject: Re: full outer performance problem
  In-Reply-To: <4281AEA1.8020600@dmi.dk>

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

This inbox is served by DDX for PostgreSQL; see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox