pg.ddx.io  pgsql-performance@postgresql.org mailing list archive  
help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: Joshua D. Drake <jd@commandprompt.com>
To: David Boreham <david_list@boreham.org>
Cc: pgsql-performance@postgresql.org
Subject: Re: Hardware/OS recommendations for large databases (
Date: Wed, 16 Nov 2005 07:47:53 -0800
Message-ID: <437B54A9.5070104@commandprompt.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <437B4773.1040404@boreham.org>
References: <3E37B936B592014B978C4415F90D662D01995F7B@MI8NYCMAIL06.Mi8.com>
	<33c6269f0511152115v1a34ab81j30f1f5df5a6c6956@mail.gmail.com>
	<437B3B18.1040509@commandprompt.com>
	<437B4773.1040404@boreham.org>

>
> I guess I've never bought into the vendor story that there are
> two reliability grades. Why would they bother making two
> different kinds of bearing, motor etc ? Seems like it's more
> likely an excuse to justify higher prices. In my experience the
> expensive SCSI drives I own break frequently while the cheapo
> desktop drives just keep chunking along (modulo certain products
> that have a specific known reliability problem).

I don't know if the reliability grade is true or not but what I can tell
you is that I have scsi drives that are 5+ years old that still work without
issue.

I have never had an IDE drive last longer than 3 years (when used in 
production).

That being said, so what. That is what raid is for. You loose a drive 
and hot swap
it back in. Heck keep a hotspare in the trays.

Joshua D. Drake


>
> I'd expect that a larger number of hotter drives will give a less 
> reliable
> system than a smaller number of cooler ones.
>
>
>
> ---------------------------(end of broadcast)---------------------------
> TIP 4: Have you searched our list archives?
>
>               http://archives.postgresql.org




view thread (173+ messages)  latest in thread

Message-ID: <437B54A9.5070104@commandprompt.com>
Permalink:  ../437B54A9.5070104@commandprompt.com/
Also on:    postgresql.org/message-id/437B54A9.5070104@commandprompt.com

 · 

reply

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Reply to all the recipients using the --to and --cc options:
  reply via email

  To: pgsql-performance@postgresql.org
  Cc: jd@commandprompt.com, david_list@boreham.org
  Subject: Re: Hardware/OS recommendations for large databases (
  In-Reply-To: <437B54A9.5070104@commandprompt.com>

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

This inbox is served by DDX for PostgreSQL; see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox