From: Markus Schaber <schabi@logix-tt.com>
To: pgsql-performance@postgresql.org
Cc: Marcos <mjs_ops@gmx.net>
Subject: Re: [PERFORMANCE] Stored Procedures
Date: Mon, 23 Jan 2006 13:30:31 +0100
Message-ID: <43D4CC67.9050703@logix-tt.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <1138004054.949.10.camel@servidor>
References: <43D130EF.3010205@zg.htnet.hr>
<20060120191031.GO20182@pervasive.com>
<43D13C2F.1030203@zg.htnet.hr>
<20060120213455.GT20182@pervasive.com>
<1138004054.949.10.camel@servidor>
Hi, Marcos,
Marcos wrote:
> This one was my doubt, perhaps in based desktop applications this is
> true, but in web applications this is not the re-connecting is
> constant :(.
If this is true, then you have a much bigger performance problem than
query plan preparation.
You really should consider using a connection pool (most web application
servers provide pooling facilities) or some other means to keep the
connection between several http requests.
Worried,
Markus
--
Markus Schaber | Logical Tracking&Tracing International AG
Dipl. Inf. | Software Development GIS
Fight against software patents in EU! www.ffii.org www.nosoftwarepatents.org
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Reply to all the recipients using the --to and --cc options:
reply via email
To: pgsql-performance@postgresql.org
Cc: schabi@logix-tt.com, mjs_ops@gmx.net
Subject: Re: [PERFORMANCE] Stored Procedures
In-Reply-To: <43D4CC67.9050703@logix-tt.com>
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
This inbox is served by DDX for PostgreSQL; see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox