From: Matthew T. O'Connor <matthew@zeut.net>
To: Gábriel Ákos <akos.gabriel@i-logic.hu>
Cc: pgsql-performance@postgresql.org
Subject: Re: count(*) performance
Date: Mon, 27 Mar 2006 14:21:38 -0500
Message-ID: <44283B42.7060803@zeut.net> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <44282D45.7020008@i-logic.hu>
References: <C04D6B95.20285%llonergan@greenplum.com>
<44282D45.7020008@i-logic.hu>
Gábriel Ákos wrote:
> Luke Lonergan wrote:
>> Gabriel,
>>
>> On 3/27/06 10:05 AM, "Gábriel Ákos" <akos.gabriel@i-logic.hu> wrote:
>>
>>> That gave me an idea. I thought that autovacuum is doing it right, but I
>>> issued a vacuum full analyze verbose , and it worked all the day.
>>> After that I've tweaked memory settings a bit too (more fsm_pages)
>>
>> Oops! I replied to your disk speed before I saw this.
>>
>> The only thing is - you probably don't want to do a "vacuum full", but
>> rather a simple "vacuum" should be enough.
>
> I thought that too. Autovacuum is running on our system but it didn't do
> the trick. Anyway the issue is solved, thank you all for helping. :)
Yeah, it would be nice of autovacuum had some way of raising a flag to
the admin that given current settings (thresholds, FSM etc...), it's not
keeping up with the activity. I don't know how to do this, but I hope
someone else has some good ideas.
Matt
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Reply to all the recipients using the --to and --cc options:
reply via email
To: pgsql-performance@postgresql.org
Cc: matthew@zeut.net, akos.gabriel@i-logic.hu
Subject: Re: count(*) performance
In-Reply-To: <44283B42.7060803@zeut.net>
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
This inbox is served by DDX for PostgreSQL; see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox