pg.ddx.io  pgsql-performance@postgresql.org mailing list archive  
help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: Joshua D. Drake <jd@commandprompt.com>
To: Thomas F. O'Connell <tfo@sitening.com>
Cc: Kenji Morishige <kenjim@juniper.net>
Cc: pgsql-performance@postgresql.org
Subject: Re: most bang for buck with ~ $20,000
Date: Tue, 08 Aug 2006 16:24:07 -0700
Message-ID: <44D91D17.30106@commandprompt.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <82C06632-148B-4489-90EB-BBB8A6BD1159@sitening.com>
References: <20060808204354.GN29379@juniper.net>
	<44D906E1.7010405@commandprompt.com>
	<9EE66C7F-0B04-4472-9EBD-CD567AC9EA1D@sitening.com>
	<44D90FFE.7010807@commandprompt.com>
	<82C06632-148B-4489-90EB-BBB8A6BD1159@sitening.com>

> 
> In which case, which is theoretically better (since I don't have a 
> convenient test bed at the moment) for WAL in a write-heavy environment? 
> More disks in a RAID 10 (which should theoretically improve write 
> throughput in general, to a point) or a 2-disk RAID 1? Does it become a 
> price/performance question, or is there virtually no benefit to throwing 
> more disks at RAID 10 for WAL if you turn off journaling on the filesystem?

Over 4 drives, I would gather that RAID 10 wouldn't gain you anything. 
Possibly over 6 or 8 however, it may be faster because you are writing 
smaller chunks of data, even if two copies of each.

Sincerely,

Joshua D. Drake


-- 

    === The PostgreSQL Company: Command Prompt, Inc. ===
Sales/Support: +1.503.667.4564 || 24x7/Emergency: +1.800.492.2240
    Providing the most comprehensive  PostgreSQL solutions since 1997
              http://www.commandprompt.com/





view thread (27+ messages)  latest in thread

Message-ID: <44D91D17.30106@commandprompt.com>
Permalink:  ../44D91D17.30106@commandprompt.com/
Also on:    postgresql.org/message-id/44D91D17.30106@commandprompt.com

 · 

reply

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Reply to all the recipients using the --to and --cc options:
  reply via email

  To: pgsql-performance@postgresql.org
  Cc: jd@commandprompt.com, tfo@sitening.com, kenjim@juniper.net
  Subject: Re: most bang for buck with ~ $20,000
  In-Reply-To: <44D91D17.30106@commandprompt.com>

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

This inbox is served by DDX for PostgreSQL; see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox