pg.ddx.io  pgsql-performance@postgresql.org mailing list archive  
help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: Joshua D. Drake <jd@commandprompt.com>
To: Dave Cramer <pg@fastcrypt.com>
Cc: Merlin Moncure <mmoncure@gmail.com>
Cc: Guillaume Cottenceau <gc@mnc.ch>
Cc: pgsql-performance@postgresql.org
Subject: Re: increasing shared buffers: how much should be removed
Date: Fri, 01 Sep 2006 17:24:18 -0700
Message-ID: <44F8CF32.9040606@commandprompt.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <E3AD303F-06FE-4034-A176-3F532720A386@fastcrypt.com>
References: <87veo7a5dn.fsf@meuh.mnc.lan>
	<b42b73150609011249p612ccd27gbb5ee4db9b5b10f4@mail.gmail.com>
	<E3AD303F-06FE-4034-A176-3F532720A386@fastcrypt.com>

>>
>> I think 'shared buffers' is one of the most overrated settings from a
>> performance standpoint.  however you must ensure there is enough for
>> things the server does besides caching.  It used to be a bigger deal
>> than it is in modern versionf of postgresql modern operating systems.

Previous to 8.1 I would agree with you, but as of 8.1 it is probably the 
most underrated.

Joshua D. Drake


>>
>> merlin
>>
> So if shared buffers is the most overrated, what do you consider the 
> proper way of tuning ?
>> ---------------------------(end of broadcast)---------------------------
>> TIP 9: In versions below 8.0, the planner will ignore your desire to
>>       choose an index scan if your joining column's datatypes do not
>>       match
>>
> 
> 
> ---------------------------(end of broadcast)---------------------------
> TIP 1: if posting/reading through Usenet, please send an appropriate
>       subscribe-nomail command to majordomo@postgresql.org so that your
>       message can get through to the mailing list cleanly
> 


-- 

    === The PostgreSQL Company: Command Prompt, Inc. ===
Sales/Support: +1.503.667.4564 || 24x7/Emergency: +1.800.492.2240
    Providing the most comprehensive  PostgreSQL solutions since 1997
              http://www.commandprompt.com/





view thread (10+ messages)  latest in thread

Message-ID: <44F8CF32.9040606@commandprompt.com>
Permalink:  ../44F8CF32.9040606@commandprompt.com/
Also on:    postgresql.org/message-id/44F8CF32.9040606@commandprompt.com

 · 

reply

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Reply to all the recipients using the --to and --cc options:
  reply via email

  To: pgsql-performance@postgresql.org
  Cc: jd@commandprompt.com, pg@fastcrypt.com, mmoncure@gmail.com, gc@mnc.ch
  Subject: Re: increasing shared buffers: how much should be removed
  In-Reply-To: <44F8CF32.9040606@commandprompt.com>

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

This inbox is served by DDX for PostgreSQL; see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox