From: Joshua D. Drake <jd@commandprompt.com>
To: pgsql-performance@postgresql.org
Subject: Re: RAID 0 not as fast as expected
Date: Sat, 16 Sep 2006 17:44:48 -0700
Message-ID: <450C9A80.2050708@commandprompt.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20060917000843.GA16058@uio.no>
References: <78ED28FACE63744386D68D8A9D1CF5D42099AF@MAIL.corp.lumeta.com>
<C131DACC.31421%llonergan@greenplum.com>
<20060917000843.GA16058@uio.no>
Steinar H. Gunderson wrote:
> On Sat, Sep 16, 2006 at 04:46:04PM -0700, Luke Lonergan wrote:
>> Yes. What's pretty large? We've had to redefine large recently, now we're
>> talking about systems with between 100TB and 1,000TB.
>
> Do you actually have PostgreSQL databases in that size range?
No, they have databases in MPP that are that large :)
Joshua D. Drake
>
> /* Steinar */
--
=== The PostgreSQL Company: Command Prompt, Inc. ===
Sales/Support: +1.503.667.4564 || 24x7/Emergency: +1.800.492.2240
Providing the most comprehensive PostgreSQL solutions since 1997
http://www.commandprompt.com/
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Reply to all the recipients using the --to and --cc options:
reply via email
To: pgsql-performance@postgresql.org
Cc: jd@commandprompt.com
Subject: Re: RAID 0 not as fast as expected
In-Reply-To: <450C9A80.2050708@commandprompt.com>
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
This inbox is served by DDX for PostgreSQL; see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox