From: Arjen van der Meijden <acmmailing@tweakers.net>
To: Mindaugas <mind@bi.lt>
Cc: pgsql-performance@postgresql.org
Subject: Re: Core 2 or Opteron
Date: Thu, 07 Dec 2006 11:29:48 +0100
Message-ID: <4577ED1C.1040600@tweakers.net> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <019401c719e9$07449d00$f20214ac@bite.lt>
References: <019401c719e9$07449d00$f20214ac@bite.lt>
These benchmarks are all done using 64 bit linux:
http://tweakers.net/reviews/646
Best regards,
Arjen
On 7-12-2006 11:18 Mindaugas wrote:
>
> Hello,
>
> We're planning new server or two for PostgreSQL and I'm wondering Intel
> Core 2 (Woodcrest for servers?) or Opteron is faster for PostgreSQL now?
>
> When I look through hardware sites Core 2 wins. But I believe those tests
> mostly are being done in 32 bits. Does the picture change in 64 bits?
>
> And I also remember that in PostgreSQL Opteron earlier had huge advantage
> over older Xeons. But did Intel manage to change picture now?
>
> Thanks,
>
> Mindaugas
>
>
> ---------------------------(end of broadcast)---------------------------
> TIP 9: In versions below 8.0, the planner will ignore your desire to
> choose an index scan if your joining column's datatypes do not
> match
>
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Reply to all the recipients using the --to and --cc options:
reply via email
To: pgsql-performance@postgresql.org
Cc: acmmailing@tweakers.net, mind@bi.lt
Subject: Re: Core 2 or Opteron
In-Reply-To: <4577ED1C.1040600@tweakers.net>
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
This inbox is served by DDX for PostgreSQL; see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox