pg.ddx.io  pgsql-performance@postgresql.org mailing list archive  
help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: Ireneusz Pluta <ipluta@wp.pl>
To: pgsql-performance@postgresql.org
Subject: SATA RAID: Promise vs. 3ware
Date: Tue, 20 Mar 2007 14:23:11 +0100
Message-ID: <45FFE03F.4060100@wp.pl> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <45FE6DD4.7080304@rentalia.com>
References: <45FE6DD4.7080304@rentalia.com>

Hello all,

I sent a similar post to a FreeBSD group, but thought I'd might try here too.

I am completing a box for PostgreSQL server on FreeBSD. Selecting a RAID controller I decided to go 
with 3ware SE9650-16, following good opinions about 3ware controllers found on FreeBSD and 
PostgreSQL groups.

However my dealer suggest me not to go with 3ware, and take Promise SuperTrak EX16350, instead. This 
suggestion does not have any technical background and it comes generally from the fact of limited 
availability of 16x 3ware controllers on the local market and immediate availability of Promise.

Is this technically a good idea to take Promise instead of 3ware or rather I definitely should 
insist on 3ware and wait for it?

Thank you

Ireneusz Pluta




view thread (7+ messages)  latest in thread

Message-ID: <45FFE03F.4060100@wp.pl>
Permalink:  ../45FFE03F.4060100@wp.pl/
Also on:    postgresql.org/message-id/45FFE03F.4060100@wp.pl

 · 

reply

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Reply to all the recipients using the --to and --cc options:
  reply via email

  To: pgsql-performance@postgresql.org
  Cc: ipluta@wp.pl
  Subject: Re: SATA RAID: Promise vs. 3ware
  In-Reply-To: <45FFE03F.4060100@wp.pl>

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

This inbox is served by DDX for PostgreSQL; see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox