pg.ddx.io  pgsql-performance@postgresql.org mailing list archive  
help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: Richard Huxton <dev@archonet.com>
To: Bastian Voigt <post@bastian-voigt.de>
Cc: pgsql-performance@postgresql.org
Subject: Re: Performance Problem with Vacuum of bytea table (PG 8.0.13)
Date: Fri, 25 May 2007 12:51:30 +0100
Message-ID: <4656CDC2.6030106@archonet.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <4656C411.8010509@bastian-voigt.de>
References: <46569E6A.2060509@bastian-voigt.de>
	<4656BB5E.3000109@archonet.com>
	<4656BEF1.4050609@bastian-voigt.de>
	<4656C1C7.3000003@archonet.com>
	<4656C411.8010509@bastian-voigt.de>

Bastian Voigt wrote:
> Richard Huxton wrote:
>>
>> I was about to say that you can tune pg_autovacuum, but I just checked 
>> your original post and you're running 8.0.x - not sure about that one.
> The system catalog pg_autovacuum which allows finetuning autovacuum at 
> table level was introduced in 8.1 :-(

Hmm - thought it might have been :-(

>> You'll have to check the documentation for that version to see if you 
>> can either:
>> 1. exclude that table from pg_autovacuum
>> 2. increase pg_autovacuum's sensitivity
> (1) seems to be impossible (correct me if I'm wrong..), so maybe I'll go 
> for (2) ...

No, the per-table stuff was via the system table.

>> If not, and this table is the most active, it might be simpler just to 
>> run your own vacuum-ing from a cron job.
> Well, it is one of the most active, but there are others. pg_autovacuum 
> seems to do a very good job, apart from this one table...

Do you have any settings in your postgresql.conf? Failing that, you 
would have to poke around the source.

-- 
   Richard Huxton
   Archonet Ltd



view thread (8+ messages)  latest in thread

Message-ID: <4656CDC2.6030106@archonet.com>
Permalink:  ../4656CDC2.6030106@archonet.com/
Also on:    postgresql.org/message-id/4656CDC2.6030106@archonet.com

 · 

reply

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Reply to all the recipients using the --to and --cc options:
  reply via email

  To: pgsql-performance@postgresql.org
  Cc: dev@archonet.com, post@bastian-voigt.de
  Subject: Re: Performance Problem with Vacuum of bytea table (PG 8.0.13)
  In-Reply-To: <4656CDC2.6030106@archonet.com>

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

This inbox is served by DDX for PostgreSQL; see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox