pg.ddx.io  pgsql-performance@postgresql.org mailing list archive  

help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: Joshua D. Drake <jd@commandprompt.com>
To: Scott Marlowe <smarlowe@g2switchworks.com>
Cc: Andrew Sullivan <ajs@crankycanuck.ca>
Cc: pgsql-performance@postgresql.org
Subject: Re: Performance query about large tables, lots of concurrent access
Date: Thu, 21 Jun 2007 16:24:56 -0700
Message-ID: <467B08C8.4040709@commandprompt.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <467B0568.9040001@g2switchworks.com>
References: <4676DD57.7070304@metacarta.com>
	<20070620175300.GN30369@alvh.no-ip.org>
	<46796A08.8080601@metacarta.com>
	<200706201425.28557.sthomas@leapfrogonline.com>
	<46799C45.7080805@metacarta.com>
	<4679AE24.9070005@g2switchworks.com>
	<4679B6C7.3080207@metacarta.com>
	<467A9CE5.508@g2switchworks.com>
	<467AA77D.3030204@metacarta.com>
	<20070621171148.GC5500@phlogiston.dyndns.org>
	<467B0568.9040001@g2switchworks.com>

Scott Marlowe wrote:
> Andrew Sullivan wrote:
>> On Thu, Jun 21, 2007 at 12:29:49PM -0400, Karl Wright wrote:
>>  
>>> I checked the disk picture - this is a RAID disk array with 6 drives, 
>>> with a bit more than 1Tbyte total storage.  15,000 RPM.  It would be 
>>> hard to get more/faster disk than that.
>>>     
>>
>> What kind of RAID?  It's _easy_ to get faster disk that 6 drives in
>> RAID5, even if they're 15,000 RPM.  The rotation speed is the least
>> of your problems in many RAID implementations.
>>   
> Also, the controller means a lot.  I'd rather have a 4 disk RAID-10 with 
> an Areca card with BBU Cache than a 16 disk RAID 5 on an adaptec (with 
> or without cache... :) )

Oh come on... Adaptec makes a great skeet.

Joshua D. Drake


> 
> ---------------------------(end of broadcast)---------------------------
> TIP 4: Have you searched our list archives?
> 
>               http://archives.postgresql.org
> 


-- 

       === The PostgreSQL Company: Command Prompt, Inc. ===
Sales/Support: +1.503.667.4564 || 24x7/Emergency: +1.800.492.2240
Providing the most comprehensive  PostgreSQL solutions since 1997
              http://www.commandprompt.com/

Donate to the PostgreSQL Project: http://www.postgresql.org/about/donate
PostgreSQL Replication: http://www.commandprompt.com/products/




view thread (56+ messages)  latest in thread

Message-ID: <467B08C8.4040709@commandprompt.com>
Permalink:  ../467B08C8.4040709@commandprompt.com/
Also on:    postgresql.org/message-id/467B08C8.4040709@commandprompt.com

 · 

reply
Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Reply to all the recipients using the --to and --cc options:
  reply via email

  To: pgsql-performance@postgresql.org
  Cc: jd@commandprompt.com, smarlowe@g2switchworks.com, ajs@crankycanuck.ca
  Subject: Re: Performance query about large tables, lots of concurrent access
  In-Reply-To: <467B08C8.4040709@commandprompt.com>

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

This inbox is served by DDX for PostgreSQL; see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox