pg.ddx.io  pgsql-performance@postgresql.org mailing list archive  

help / color / mirror / Atom feed

From: Arjen van der Meijden <acmmailing@tweakers.net>
To: Mark Lewis <mark.lewis@mir3.com>
Cc: Harsh Azad <harsh.azad@gmail.com>
Cc: pgsql-performance@postgresql.org
Subject: Re: SAN vs Internal Disks
Date: Thu, 06 Sep 2007 21:40:25 +0200
Message-ID: <46E057A9.4040606@tweakers.net> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <1189103360.6161.68.camel@archimedes>
References: <a199704d0709060535q6fea139aq2e3863e685555b0d@mail.gmail.com>
	<1189089521.6161.53.camel@archimedes>
	<a199704d0709060958q5ebd6f81oe3562396a5c6040c@mail.gmail.com>
	<1189103360.6161.68.camel@archimedes>

On 6-9-2007 20:29 Mark Lewis wrote:
> Maybe I'm jaded by past experiences, but the only real use case I can
> see to justify a SAN for a database would be something like Oracle RAC,
> but I'm not aware of any PG equivalent to that.

PG Cluster II seems to be able to do that, but I don't know whether 
that's production quality already...

Arjen

view thread (37+ messages)  latest in thread

Message-ID: <46E057A9.4040606@tweakers.net>
Permalink:  ../46E057A9.4040606@tweakers.net/
Also on:    postgresql.org/message-id/46E057A9.4040606@tweakers.net

copy link · copy postgr.es

reply

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Reply to all the recipients using the --to and --cc options:
  reply via email

  To: pgsql-performance@postgresql.org
  Cc: acmmailing@tweakers.net, mark.lewis@mir3.com, harsh.azad@gmail.com
  Subject: Re: SAN vs Internal Disks
  In-Reply-To: <46E057A9.4040606@tweakers.net>

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

This inbox is served by DDX for PostgreSQL; see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox