From: Tom Lane <tgl@sss.pgh.pa.us>
To: Craig A. James <cjames@modgraph-usa.com>
Cc: Bill Moran <wmoran@collaborativefusion.com>
Cc: pgsql-performance@postgresql.org
Subject: Re: Estimate the size of the SQL file generated by pg_dump utility
Date: Tue, 06 Mar 2007 10:31:37 -0500
Message-ID: <4706.1173195097@sss.pgh.pa.us> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <45ED83C1.6000003@modgraph-usa.com>
References: <45ECCFCA.2010501@presinet.com>
<200703060222.l262MLi09584@momjian.us>
<20070306084437.1f52c123.wmoran@collaborativefusion.com>
<45ED83C1.6000003@modgraph-usa.com>
"Craig A. James" <cjames@modgraph-usa.com> writes:
> Bill Moran wrote:
>> I have no idea if that's legally binding or not, but I've talked to a few
>> associates who have some experience in law, and they all argue that email
>> disclaimers probably aren't legally binding anyway -- so the result is
>> undefined.
> No, it's not legally binding. Agreements are only binding if both
> parties agree, and someone sending you email has not consented to your
> statement.
To take this back to the PG problem: it's probably true that we can
ignore disclaimers as far as receiving, redistributing, and archiving
mail list submissions goes. On the other hand, accepting a patch is
another matter.
regards, tom lane
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Reply to all the recipients using the --to and --cc options:
reply via email
To: pgsql-performance@postgresql.org
Cc: tgl@sss.pgh.pa.us, cjames@modgraph-usa.com, wmoran@collaborativefusion.com
Subject: Re: Estimate the size of the SQL file generated by pg_dump utility
In-Reply-To: <4706.1173195097@sss.pgh.pa.us>
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
This inbox is served by DDX for PostgreSQL; see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox