pg.ddx.io  pgsql-performance@postgresql.org mailing list archive  
help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: James Mansion <james@mansionfamily.plus.com>
To: PFC <lists@peufeu.com>
Cc: Greg Smith <gsmith@gregsmith.com>
Cc: Laszlo Nagy <gandalf@shopzeus.com>
Cc: pgsql-performance@postgresql.org, Tony Nagy <tony@shopzeus.com>
Subject: Re: Planning a new server - help needed
Date: Sat, 29 Mar 2008 16:47:53 +0000
Message-ID: <47EE72B9.1000507@mansionfamily.plus.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <op.t8r6d212cigqcu@apollo13.peufeu.com>
References: <47ECB4F6.1040901@shopzeus.com>
	<Pine.GSO.4.64.0803281300240.2521@westnet.com>
	<47EE1B1F.20506@mansionfamily.plus.com>
	<op.t8r6d212cigqcu@apollo13.peufeu.com>

PFC wrote:
>
>> Why do you claim that 'More platters also means slower seeks
>> and generally slower performance.'?
>
>     More platters -> more heads -> heavier head assembly -> slower 
> seek time
Note sure I've sen a lot of evidence of that in drive specifications!

>     Gigabyte should revamp their i-RAM to use ECC RAM of a larger 
> capacity... and longer lasting battery backup...
You would think a decent capacitor or rechargable button battery would 
be enough to dump it to a flash memory.
No problem with flash wear then.
>     I wonder, how many write cycles those Flash drives can take before 
> reliability becomes a problem...
Hard to get data isn't it? I believe its hundreds of thousands to 
millions now. Now each record in most OLTP
tables is rewritten a few times unless its stuff that can go into temp 
tables etc, which should be elsewhere.
Index pages clearly get rewritten often.

I suspect a mix of storage technologies will be handy for some time yet 
- WAL on disk, and temp tables on
disk with no synchronous fsync requirement.

I think life is about to get interesting in DBMS storage.  All good for 
us users.

James




view thread (14+ messages)  latest in thread

Message-ID: <47EE72B9.1000507@mansionfamily.plus.com>
Permalink:  ../47EE72B9.1000507@mansionfamily.plus.com/
Also on:    postgresql.org/message-id/47EE72B9.1000507@mansionfamily.plus.com

 · 

reply

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Reply to all the recipients using the --to and --cc options:
  reply via email

  To: pgsql-performance@postgresql.org
  Cc: james@mansionfamily.plus.com, lists@peufeu.com, gsmith@gregsmith.com, gandalf@shopzeus.com, tony@shopzeus.com
  Subject: Re: Planning a new server - help needed
  In-Reply-To: <47EE72B9.1000507@mansionfamily.plus.com>

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

This inbox is served by DDX for PostgreSQL; see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox