From: David Boreham <david_list@boreham.org>
To: pgsql-performance@postgresql.org
Subject: Re: Intel SSDs that may not suck
Date: Wed, 06 Apr 2011 21:52:03 -0600
Message-ID: <4D9D34E3.9090909@boreham.org> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <201104070319.060633@ms14.lnh.mail.rcn.net>
References: <4D90EDB6.2080609@2ndQuadrant.com>
<4D9A6FB6.2000702@2ndQuadrant.com>
<4D9D1FC3.4020207@2ndQuadrant.com>
<4D9D27D0.9040800@boreham.org>
<201104070319.060633@ms14.lnh.mail.rcn.net>
On 4/6/2011 9:19 PM, gnuoytr@rcn.com wrote:
> SSDs have been around for quite some time. The first that I've found is Texas Memory. Not quite 1977, but not flash either, although they've been doing so for a couple of years.
Well, I built my first ram disk (which of course I thought I had
invented, at the time) in 1982.
But today we're seeing solid state storage seriously challenging
rotating media across all applications, except at the TB and beyond
scale. That's what's new.
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Reply to all the recipients using the --to and --cc options:
reply via email
To: pgsql-performance@postgresql.org
Cc: david_list@boreham.org
Subject: Re: Intel SSDs that may not suck
In-Reply-To: <4D9D34E3.9090909@boreham.org>
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
This inbox is served by DDX for PostgreSQL; see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox