From: Jesper Krogh <jesper@krogh.cc>
To: Greg Smith <greg@2ndQuadrant.com>
To: pgsql-performance@postgresql.org <pgsql-performance@postgresql.org>
Subject: Re: Intel SSDs that may not suck
Date: Thu, 07 Apr 2011 06:27:57 +0200
Message-ID: <4D9D3D4D.300@krogh.cc> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <4D90EDB6.2080609@2ndQuadrant.com>
References: <4D90EDB6.2080609@2ndQuadrant.com>
On 2011-03-28 22:21, Greg Smith wrote:
> Some may still find these two cheap for enterprise use, given the use
> of MLC limits how much activity these drives can handle. But it's
> great to have a new option for lower budget system that can tolerate
> some risk there.
>
Drifting of the topic slightly.. Has anyone opinions/experience with:
http://www.ocztechnology.com/ocz-z-drive-r2-p88-pci-express-ssd.html
They seem to be "like" the FusionIO drives just quite a lot cheaper,
wonder what the state of those 512MB is in case of a power-loss.
--
Jesper
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Reply to all the recipients using the --to and --cc options:
reply via email
To: pgsql-performance@postgresql.org
Cc: jesper@krogh.cc, greg@2ndQuadrant.com
Subject: Re: Intel SSDs that may not suck
In-Reply-To: <4D9D3D4D.300@krogh.cc>
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
This inbox is served by DDX for PostgreSQL; see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox