pg.ddx.io  pgsql-performance@postgresql.org mailing list archive  
help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: Mark Kirkwood <mark.kirkwood@catalyst.net.nz>
To: Grzegorz Jaśkiewicz <gryzman@gmail.com>
Cc: postgres performance list <pgsql-performance@postgresql.org>
Subject: Re: serveRAID M5014 SAS
Date: Fri, 27 May 2011 10:43:25 +1200
Message-ID: <4DDED78D.6060508@catalyst.net.nz> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <BANLkTin_R98uAP4gCutGB61uTNoQSgELbA@mail.gmail.com>
References: <BANLkTi=fE2YCS0Lra42ei1hFrKqXdVk2jA@mail.gmail.com>
	<4DDD81BB.4080801@catalyst.net.nz>
	<4DDD85C7.6030109@catalyst.net.nz>
	<BANLkTi=PAymQvudx1eyuuOV9vAAoydan9g@mail.gmail.com>
	<4DDE0E77.6070804@catalyst.net.nz>
	<BANLkTin_R98uAP4gCutGB61uTNoQSgELbA@mail.gmail.com>

On 26/05/11 20:31, Grzegorz Jaśkiewicz wrote:
> Would HT have any impact to the I/O performance (postgresql, and fs in
> general) ?.
>

There have been previous discussions on this list about HT on vs off (I 
can't recall what the consensus, if any about what the cause of any 
performance difference was). In our case HT off gave us much better 
results for what we think the typical number of clients will be  - see 
attached (server learn-db1 is setup with trivial hardware raid and then 
software raided via md, learn-db2 has its raid all in hardware. We've 
ended up going with the latter setup).

Note that the highest tps on the graph is about 2100 - we got this upto 
just over 2300 by changing from ext4 to xfs in later tests, and managed 
to push the tps for 100 clients up a little by setting no read ahead 
(NORA) for the arrays.

Cheers

Mark

Attachments:

runhtoff.png (image/png, 14.5K) download view image
runhton.png (image/png, 14.0K) download view image

view thread (16+ messages)  latest in thread

Message-ID: <4DDED78D.6060508@catalyst.net.nz>
Permalink:  ../4DDED78D.6060508@catalyst.net.nz/
Also on:    postgresql.org/message-id/4DDED78D.6060508@catalyst.net.nz

 · 

reply

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Reply to all the recipients using the --to and --cc options:
  reply via email

  To: pgsql-performance@postgresql.org
  Cc: mark.kirkwood@catalyst.net.nz, gryzman@gmail.com
  Subject: Re: serveRAID M5014 SAS
  In-Reply-To: <4DDED78D.6060508@catalyst.net.nz>

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

This inbox is served by DDX for PostgreSQL; see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox