From: Mark Kirkwood <mark.kirkwood@catalyst.net.nz>
To: pgsql-performance@postgresql.org
Subject: Re: HT on or off for E5-26xx ?
Date: Wed, 07 Nov 2012 17:16:20 +1300
Message-ID: <5099E094.9010703@catalyst.net.nz> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <5099D5FA.90802@boreham.org>
References: <5099D5FA.90802@boreham.org>
On 07/11/12 16:31, David Boreham wrote:
>
> I'm bringing up a new type of server using Intel E5-2620 (unisocket)
> which was selected for good SpecIntRate performance vs cost/power (201
> for $410 and 95W).
>
> Was assuming it was 6-core but I just noticed it has HT which is
> currently enabled since I see 12 cores in /proc/cpuinfo
>
> Question for the performance experts : is it better to have HT enabled
> or disabled for this generation of Xeon ?
> Workload will be moderately concurrent, small OLTP type transactions.
> We'll also run a few low-load VMs (using KVM) and a big Java application.
>
>
>
I've been benchmarking a E5-4640 (4 socket) and hyperthreading off gave
much better scaling behaviour in pgbench (gentle rise and flatten off),
whereas with hyperthreading on there was a dramatic falloff after approx
number clients = number of (hyperthreaded) cpus. The box is intended to
be a pure db server, so we are running with hyperthreading off.
Cheers
Mark
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Reply to all the recipients using the --to and --cc options:
reply via email
To: pgsql-performance@postgresql.org
Cc: mark.kirkwood@catalyst.net.nz
Subject: Re: HT on or off for E5-26xx ?
In-Reply-To: <5099E094.9010703@catalyst.net.nz>
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
This inbox is served by DDX for PostgreSQL; see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox