pg.ddx.io  pgsql-performance@postgresql.org mailing list archive  
help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: Greg Smith <greg@2ndQuadrant.com>
To: Merlin Moncure <mmoncure@gmail.com>
Cc: Tomas Vondra <tv@fuzzy.cz>
Cc: pgsql-performance@postgresql.org
Subject: Re: Reliability with RAID 10 SSD and Streaming Replication
Date: Tue, 21 May 2013 20:19:09 -0400
Message-ID: <519C0EFD.9080002@2ndQuadrant.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <CAHyXU0wvW-USgbkXAYEHLG2fHgj=UdZi1aCFoVWBMQEsOFZy+A@mail.gmail.com>
References: <CAAE-9WHMycEZOB5J6HKME5AZLEdL2hYF+FV8hzbLksJinq=EJg@mail.gmail.com>
	<51957499.6050905@fuzzy.cz>
	<519991EB.8010208@2ndQuadrant.com>
	<519A8E29.60702@fuzzy.cz>
	<CAHyXU0wvW-USgbkXAYEHLG2fHgj=UdZi1aCFoVWBMQEsOFZy+A@mail.gmail.com>
List-Unsubscribe:  <mailto:majordomo@postgresql.org?body=unsub%20pgsql-performance>

On 5/20/13 6:32 PM, Merlin Moncure wrote:

> When it comes to databases, particularly in the open source postgres
> world, hard drives are completely obsolete.  SSD are a couple of
> orders of magnitude faster and this (while still slow in computer
> terms) is fast enough to put storage into the modern area by anyone
> who is smart enough to connect a sata cable.

You're skirting the edge of vendor Kool-Aid here.  I'm working on a very 
detailed benchmark vs. real world piece centered on Intel's 710 models, 
one of the few reliable drives on the market.  (Yes, I have a DC S3700 
too, just not as much data yet)  While in theory these drives will hit 
two orders of magnitude speed improvement, and I have benchmarks where 
that's the case, in practice I've seen them deliver less than 5X better 
too.  You get one guess which I'd consider more likely to happen on a 
difficult database server workload.

The only really huge gain to be had using SSD is commit rate at a low 
client count.  There you can easily do 5,000/second instead of a 
spinning disk that is closer to 100, for less than what the 
battery-backed RAID card along costs to speed up mechanical drives.  My 
test server's 100GB DC S3700 was $250.  That's still not two orders of 
magnitude faster though.

-- 
Greg Smith   2ndQuadrant US    greg@2ndQuadrant.com   Baltimore, MD
PostgreSQL Training, Services, and 24x7 Support www.2ndQuadrant.com


-- 
Sent via pgsql-performance mailing list (pgsql-performance@postgresql.org)
To make changes to your subscription:
http://www.postgresql.org/mailpref/pgsql-performance



view thread (52+ messages)  latest in thread

Message-ID: <519C0EFD.9080002@2ndQuadrant.com>
Permalink:  ../519C0EFD.9080002@2ndQuadrant.com/
Also on:    postgresql.org/message-id/519C0EFD.9080002@2ndQuadrant.com

 · 

reply

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Reply to all the recipients using the --to and --cc options:
  reply via email

  To: pgsql-performance@postgresql.org
  Cc: greg@2ndQuadrant.com, mmoncure@gmail.com, tv@fuzzy.cz
  Subject: Re: Reliability with RAID 10 SSD and Streaming Replication
  In-Reply-To: <519C0EFD.9080002@2ndQuadrant.com>

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

This inbox is served by DDX for PostgreSQL; see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox