From: Mark Wong <markwkm@gmail.com>
To: Gregory Stark <stark@enterprisedb.com>
Cc: pgsql-performance\@postgresql.org <pgsql-performance@postgresql.org>
Cc: Selena Deckelmann <selenamarie@gmail.com>
Cc: Gabrielle Roth <gorthx@gmail.com>
Subject: Re: dbt-2 tuning results with postgresql-8.3.5
Date: Sun, 21 Dec 2008 01:29:46 -0800
Message-ID: <552F108E-9732-4ED6-B45D-6C651C63565E@gmail.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <87hc4yuxbl.fsf@oxford.xeocode.com>
References: <70c01d1d0812201654i5f55150ep619a6c7ff094470@mail.gmail.com>
<87hc4yuxbl.fsf@oxford.xeocode.com>
On Dec 20, 2008, at 5:33 PM, Gregory Stark wrote:
> "Mark Wong" <markwkm@gmail.com> writes:
>
>> To recap, dbt2 is a fair-use derivative of the TPC-C benchmark. We
>> are using a 1000 warehouse database, which amounts to about 100GB of
>> raw text data.
>
> Really? Do you get conforming results with 1,000 warehouses? What's
> the 95th
> percentile response time?
No, the results are not conforming. You and others have pointed that
out already. The 95th percentile response time are calculated on each
page of the previous links.
I find your questions a little odd for the input I'm asking for. Are
you under the impression we are trying to publish benchmarking
results? Perhaps this is a simple misunderstanding?
Regards,
Mark
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Reply to all the recipients using the --to and --cc options:
reply via email
To: pgsql-performance@postgresql.org
Cc: markwkm@gmail.com, stark@enterprisedb.com, selenamarie@gmail.com, gorthx@gmail.com
Subject: Re: dbt-2 tuning results with postgresql-8.3.5
In-Reply-To: <552F108E-9732-4ED6-B45D-6C651C63565E@gmail.com>
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
This inbox is served by DDX for PostgreSQL; see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox