pg.ddx.io pgsql-performance@postgresql.org mailing list archivehelp / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: Chris Browne <cbbrowne@acm.org>
To: pgsql-performance@postgresql.org
Subject: Re: VACUUM FULL vs CLUSTER
Date: Fri, 23 Sep 2005 13:48:32 -0400
Message-ID: <60ll1noetr.fsf@dba2.int.libertyrms.com> (raw)
References: <5.2.0.9.1.20050920144041.0287c300@pop.puc.cl>
<1127242399.26562.15.camel@host-140.engineering.n-able.com>
<20050923142027.GC2298@wolff.to>
<20050923181644.161bf160@svb.ucs.co.za>
svb@ucs.co.za (Stef) writes:
> Bruno Wolff III mentioned :
> => If you have a proper FSM setting you shouldn't need to do vacuum fulls
> => (unless you have an older version of postgres where index bloat might
> => be an issue).
>
> What version of postgres was the last version that had
> the index bloat problem?
I believe that was fixed in 7.3; it was certainly resolved by 7.4...
--
(format nil "~S@~S" "cbbrowne" "cbbrowne.com")
http://www.ntlug.org/~cbbrowne/spiritual.html
MICROS~1 has brought the microcomputer OS to the point where it is
more bloated than even OSes from what was previously larger classes of
machines altogether. This is perhaps Bill's single greatest
accomplishment.
view thread (8+ messages) latest in thread
Message-ID: <60ll1noetr.fsf@dba2.int.libertyrms.com> Permalink: ../60ll1noetr.fsf@dba2.int.libertyrms.com/ Also on: postgresql.org/message-id/60ll1noetr.fsf@dba2.int.libertyrms.com ·
reply
Reply instructions: You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email using any one of the following methods: * Reply to all the recipients using the --to and --cc options: reply via email To: pgsql-performance@postgresql.org Cc: cbbrowne@acm.org Subject: Re: VACUUM FULL vs CLUSTER In-Reply-To: <60ll1noetr.fsf@dba2.int.libertyrms.com> * Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client, and reply-to-all from there: mbox
This inbox is served by DDX for PostgreSQL; see mirroring instructions for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox