public inbox for [email protected]
help / color / mirror / Atom feedFrom: Mark Kirkwood <[email protected]>
To: Charles Nadeau <[email protected]>
Cc: pgsql-performa. <[email protected]>
Subject: Re: Very poor read performance, query independent
Date: Sun, 16 Jul 2017 11:48:08 +1200
Message-ID: <[email protected]> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <CADFyZw4D_DOEEtfLYSjomZoXF5Y7MDBHQCXQskTGVQbzr842fQ@mail.gmail.com>
References: <CADFyZw7aGoD0AaStxdyHByR5Qta=M5wx0v=iptKLhPUp+EOKvA@mail.gmail.com>
<[email protected]>
<CADFyZw4UanW5TbFajWKWhN9XcW+8gtCXw+kssHo47Wpr1A=zJw@mail.gmail.com>
<DM5PR07MB28103FD558CB6628CECE07BEDAA90@DM5PR07MB2810.namprd07.prod.outlook.com>
<CADFyZw6JrhsLR_eYOeCjjiQMzz5bepk6AfMRBu0hnaQg+vN-=A@mail.gmail.com>
<[email protected]>
<CADFyZw5-WzdkACN39-ND9tvBwmvfdEhFaYL3Ds82a3Rwav-neA@mail.gmail.com>
<[email protected]>
<[email protected]>
<CADFyZw4D_DOEEtfLYSjomZoXF5Y7MDBHQCXQskTGVQbzr842fQ@mail.gmail.com>
List-Unsubscribe: <mailto:[email protected]?body=unsub%20pgsql-performance>
Right, that is a bit of a show stopper for those SSD (the Intel needs
SATA 6Gb/s and the Sammy's need PCIe 3.0 to perform to their rated specs).
regards
Mark
On 16/07/17 04:12, Charles Nadeau wrote:
> Mark,
>
> The server is a . It doesn't really work with SATA drives. And when
> you find one that is compatible, it is only used at 3Gb/s with a
> maximum of 50000 IOPS (a well know caracteristic of the HP P410i SAS
> RAID controller). I am looking at getting a Kingston Digital HyperX
> Predator that I could use in one of the PCIe 2.0 x4 slot. However I am
> worried about the "thermal runaway", i.e. when the server can't get a
> temperature reading from a PCIe card, it spins the fans at full speed
> to protect the server against high temperature. The machine being next
> to my desk I worry about the deafening noise it will create.
> Thanks!
>
> Chales
>
> On Sat, Jul 15, 2017 at 1:57 AM, Mark Kirkwood
> <[email protected] <mailto:[email protected]>>
> wrote:
>
> Thinking about this a bit more - if somewhat more blazing
> performance is needed, then this could be achieved via losing the
> RAID card and spinning disks altogether and buying 1 of the NVME
> or SATA solid state products: e.g
>
> - Samsung 960 Pro or Evo 2 TB (approx 1 or 2 GB/s seq scan speeds
> and 200K IOPS)
>
> - Intel S3610 or similar 1.2 TB (500 MB/s seq scan and 30K IOPS)
>
>
> The Samsung needs an M.2 port on the mobo (but most should have
> 'em - and if not PCIe X4 adapter cards are quite cheap). The Intel
> is a bit more expensive compared to the Samsung, and is slower but
> has a longer lifetime. However for your workload the Sammy is
> probably fine.
>
> regards
>
> Mark
>
> On 15/07/17 11:09, Mark Kirkwood wrote:
>
> Ah yes - that seems more sensible (but still slower than I
> would expect for 5 disks RAID 0).
>
>
>
>
> --
> Sent via pgsql-performance mailing list
> ([email protected]
> <mailto:[email protected]>)
> To make changes to your subscription:
> http://www.postgresql.org/mailpref/pgsql-performance
> <http://www.postgresql.org/mailpref/pgsql-performance;
>
>
>
>
> --
> Charles Nadeau Ph.D.
> http://charlesnadeau.blogspot.com/
--
Sent via pgsql-performance mailing list ([email protected])
To make changes to your subscription:
http://www.postgresql.org/mailpref/pgsql-performance
reply
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Reply to all the recipients using the --to and --cc options:
reply via email
To: [email protected]
Cc: [email protected], [email protected]
Subject: Re: Very poor read performance, query independent
In-Reply-To: <[email protected]>
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
This inbox is served by agora; see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox