From: Florian Weimer <fweimer@bfk.de>
To: mladen.gogala@vmsinfo.com
Cc: pgsql-performance\@postgresql.org <pgsql-performance@postgresql.org>
Subject: Re: Any experience using "shake" defragmenter?
Date: Mon, 31 Jan 2011 16:49:53 +0000
Message-ID: <82ei7t81ce.fsf@mid.bfk.de> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <4D45C607.4070101@vmsinfo.com>
References: <4D45C607.4070101@vmsinfo.com>
* Mladen Gogala:
> Did anyone try using "shake" while the cluster is active?
As far as I can tell, it's totally unsafe.
--
Florian Weimer <fweimer@bfk.de>
BFK edv-consulting GmbH http://www.bfk.de/
Kriegsstraße 100 tel: +49-721-96201-1
D-76133 Karlsruhe fax: +49-721-96201-99
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Reply to all the recipients using the --to and --cc options:
reply via email
To: pgsql-performance@postgresql.org
Cc: fweimer@bfk.de, mladen.gogala@vmsinfo.com
Subject: Re: Any experience using "shake" defragmenter?
In-Reply-To: <82ei7t81ce.fsf@mid.bfk.de>
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
This inbox is served by DDX for PostgreSQL; see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox