From: Tom Lane <tgl@sss.pgh.pa.us>
To: Bruce Momjian <pgman@candle.pha.pa.us>
Cc: Simon Riggs <simon@2ndquadrant.com>
Cc: Pål Stenslet <paal.stenslet@exie.com>
Cc: pgsql-performance@postgresql.org
Subject: Re: Should Oracle outperform PostgreSQL on a complex
Date: Sat, 17 Dec 2005 13:35:12 -0500
Message-ID: <8933.1134844512@sss.pgh.pa.us> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <200512171643.jBHGhFA04982@candle.pha.pa.us>
References: <200512171643.jBHGhFA04982@candle.pha.pa.us>
Bruce Momjian <pgman@candle.pha.pa.us> writes:
> Added to TODO:
> * Allow star join optimizations
See my response to Simon for reasons why this doesn't seem like a
particularly good TODO item.
regards, tom lane
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Reply to all the recipients using the --to and --cc options:
reply via email
To: pgsql-performance@postgresql.org
Cc: tgl@sss.pgh.pa.us, pgman@candle.pha.pa.us, simon@2ndquadrant.com, paal.stenslet@exie.com
Subject: Re: Should Oracle outperform PostgreSQL on a complex
In-Reply-To: <8933.1134844512@sss.pgh.pa.us>
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
This inbox is served by DDX for PostgreSQL; see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox