pg.ddx.io  pgsql-performance@postgresql.org mailing list archive  
help / color / mirror / Atom feed
planner, *_collapse_limit
  2012-07-26 14:42 UTC  Marcus Engene <mengpg2@engene.se>
` Re: planner, *_collapse_limit
  2012-07-26 17:01 UTC  Merlin Moncure <mmoncure@gmail.com>
  [2+ messages in thread]

Geoserver-PostGIS performance problems
  2012-07-24 07:21 UTC  Riaan van den Dool <rvddool@csir.co.za>
` Re: Geoserver-PostGIS performance problems
  2012-07-24 07:54 UTC  Brett Walker <brett.walker@geometryit.com>
` Re: Geoserver-PostGIS performance problems
  2012-07-24 08:10 UTC  Riaan van den Dool <rvddool@csir.co.za>
` Re: Geoserver-PostGIS performance problems
  2012-07-24 15:50 UTC  Maciek Sakrejda <m.sakrejda@gmail.com>
` Re: Geoserver-PostGIS performance problems
  2012-07-25 18:45 UTC  Merlin Moncure <mmoncure@gmail.com>
` Re: Geoserver-PostGIS performance problems
  2012-07-25 19:17 UTC  Vinicius Abrahao <vinnix.bsd@gmail.com>
` Re: Geoserver-PostGIS performance problems
  2012-07-25 19:26 UTC  Merlin Moncure <mmoncure@gmail.com>
` Re: Geoserver-PostGIS performance problems
  2012-07-25 19:59 UTC  Vinicius Abrahao <vinnix.bsd@gmail.com>
` Re: Geoserver-PostGIS performance problems
  2012-07-25 20:04 UTC  Merlin Moncure <mmoncure@gmail.com>
` Re: Geoserver-PostGIS performance problems
  2012-07-26 02:13 UTC  Rural Hunter <ruralhunter@gmail.com>
` Re: Geoserver-PostGIS performance problems
  2012-07-26 06:34 UTC  Maciek Sakrejda <m.sakrejda@gmail.com>
` Re: Geoserver-PostGIS performance problems
  2012-07-26 06:51 UTC  Maciek Sakrejda <m.sakrejda@gmail.com>
` Re: Geoserver-PostGIS performance problems
  2012-07-26 13:32 UTC  Merlin Moncure <mmoncure@gmail.com>
  [13+ messages in thread]

odd planner again, pg 9.0.8
  2012-07-25 15:36 UTC  Marcus Engene <mengpg2@engene.se>
` Re: odd planner again, pg 9.0.8
  2012-07-25 16:19 UTC  Pavel Stehule <pavel.stehule@gmail.com>
` Re: odd planner again, pg 9.0.8
  2012-07-25 16:39 UTC  Tom Lane <tgl@sss.pgh.pa.us>
` Re: odd planner again, pg 9.0.8
  2012-07-25 18:11 UTC  Marcus Engene <mengpg2@engene.se>
  [4+ messages in thread]

transactions start time
  2012-07-24 11:14 UTC  Aleksei Arefjev <aleksei.arefjev@nordicgaming.com>
` Re: transactions start time
  2012-07-24 17:21 UTC  Richard Huxton <dev@archonet.com>
` Re: transactions start time
  2012-07-25 06:52 UTC  Aleksei Arefjev <aleksei.arefjev@nordicgaming.com>
` Re: transactions start time
  2012-07-25 07:37 UTC  Aleksei Arefjev <aleksei.arefjev@nordicgaming.com>
` Re: transactions start time
  2012-07-25 14:56 UTC  Tom Lane <tgl@sss.pgh.pa.us>
` Re: transactions start time
  2012-07-25 17:01 UTC  Andres Freund <andres@2ndquadrant.com>
  [6+ messages in thread]

Why do I need more time with partition table?
  2012-07-24 10:42 UTC  AI Rumman <rummandba@gmail.com>
` Re: Why do I need more time with partition table?
  2012-07-24 11:35 UTC  AI Rumman <rummandba@gmail.com>
` Re: Why do I need more time with partition table?
  2012-07-24 11:46 UTC  Jan Otto <asche@me.com>
` Re: Why do I need more time with partition table?
  2012-07-25 08:40 UTC  AI Rumman <rummandba@gmail.com>
` Re: Why do I need more time with partition table?
  2012-07-25 14:42 UTC  Jan Otto <asche@me.com>
` Re: Why do I need more time with partition table?
  2012-07-25 14:55 UTC  Jeff Janes <jeff.janes@gmail.com>
  [6+ messages in thread]

Heavy inserts load wile querying...
  2012-07-24 13:22 UTC  Ioannis Anagnostopoulos <ioannis@anatec.com>
` Re: Heavy inserts load wile querying...
  2012-07-24 14:30 UTC  Craig James <cjames@emolecules.com>
` Re: Heavy inserts load wile querying...
  2012-07-24 14:42 UTC  Ioannis Anagnostopoulos <ioannis@anatec.com>
  [3+ messages in thread]

Checkpointer split has broken things dramatically (was Re: DELETE vs TRUNCATE explanation)
  2012-07-17 22:56 UTC  Tom Lane <tgl@sss.pgh.pa.us>
` Re: Checkpointer split has broken things dramatically (was Re: DELETE vs TRUNCATE explanation)
  2012-07-17 23:48 UTC  Peter Geoghegan <peter@2ndquadrant.com>
` Re: Checkpointer split has broken things dramatically (was Re: DELETE vs TRUNCATE explanation)
  2012-07-18 00:13 UTC  Craig Ringer <ringerc@ringerc.id.au>
` Re: Re: Checkpointer split has broken things dramatically (was Re: DELETE vs TRUNCATE explanation)
  2012-07-18 00:31 UTC  Tom Lane <tgl@sss.pgh.pa.us>
` Re: Checkpointer split has broken things dramatically (was Re: DELETE vs TRUNCATE explanation)
  2012-07-18 04:00 UTC  Greg Smith <greg@2ndQuadrant.com>
` Re: Checkpointer split has broken things dramatically (was Re: DELETE vs TRUNCATE explanation)
  2012-07-18 04:20 UTC  Craig Ringer <ringerc@ringerc.id.au>
` Re: Re: Checkpointer split has broken things dramatically (was Re: DELETE vs TRUNCATE explanation)
  2012-07-18 04:57 UTC  Craig Ringer <ringerc@ringerc.id.au>
` Re: Checkpointer split has broken things dramatically (was Re: DELETE vs TRUNCATE explanation)
  2012-07-18 05:56 UTC  Tom Lane <tgl@sss.pgh.pa.us>
` Re: Re: Checkpointer split has broken things dramatically (was Re: DELETE vs TRUNCATE explanation)
  2012-07-18 06:00 UTC  Tom Lane <tgl@sss.pgh.pa.us>
` Re: Checkpointer split has broken things dramatically (was Re: DELETE vs TRUNCATE explanation)
  2012-07-18 07:30 UTC  Heikki Linnakangas <heikki.linnakangas@enterprisedb.com>
` Re: Checkpointer split has broken things dramatically (was Re: DELETE vs TRUNCATE explanation)
  2012-07-18 12:26 UTC  Robert Haas <robertmhaas@gmail.com>
` Re: Checkpointer split has broken things dramatically (was Re: DELETE vs TRUNCATE explanation)
  2012-07-18 21:45 UTC  Simon Riggs <simon@2ndQuadrant.com>
` Re: Checkpointer split has broken things dramatically (was Re: DELETE vs TRUNCATE explanation)
  2012-07-23 04:37 UTC  David Fetter <david@fetter.org>
` Re: Checkpointer split has broken things dramatically (was Re: DELETE vs TRUNCATE explanation)
  2012-07-23 12:29 UTC  Andrew Dunstan <andrew@dunslane.net>
` Re: Checkpointer split has broken things dramatically (was Re: DELETE vs TRUNCATE explanation)
  2012-07-23 12:41 UTC  David Fetter <david@fetter.org>
` Re: Checkpointer split has broken things dramatically (was Re: DELETE vs TRUNCATE explanation)
  2012-07-23 12:56 UTC  Andrew Dunstan <andrew@dunslane.net>
` Re: Checkpointer split has broken things dramatically (was Re: DELETE vs TRUNCATE explanation)
  2012-07-23 13:04 UTC  Craig Ringer <ringerc@ringerc.id.au>
` Re: Checkpointer split has broken things dramatically (was Re: DELETE vs TRUNCATE explanation)
  2012-07-23 13:47 UTC  Andrew Dunstan <andrew@dunslane.net>
` Re: Checkpointer split has broken things dramatically (was Re: DELETE vs TRUNCATE explanation)
  2012-07-23 13:58 UTC  Craig Ringer <ringerc@ringerc.id.au>
` Re: Checkpointer split has broken things dramatically (was Re: DELETE vs TRUNCATE explanation)
  2012-07-23 15:02 UTC  Jeff Janes <jeff.janes@gmail.com>
` Re: Checkpointer split has broken things dramatically (was Re: DELETE vs TRUNCATE explanation)
  2012-07-24 13:33 UTC  Greg Stark <stark@mit.edu>
  [21+ messages in thread]

Shards + hash = forever running queries
  2012-07-23 10:03 UTC  Daniele Varrazzo <daniele.varrazzo@gmail.com>
` Re: Shards + hash = forever running queries
  2012-07-23 11:43 UTC  Daniele Varrazzo <daniele.varrazzo@gmail.com>
` Re: Shards + hash = forever running queries
  2012-07-23 15:07 UTC  Tom Lane <tgl@sss.pgh.pa.us>
` Re: Shards + hash = forever running queries
  2012-07-24 09:06 UTC  Daniele Varrazzo <daniele.varrazzo@gmail.com>
  [4+ messages in thread]

Efficiency of EXISTS?
  2012-07-23 21:12 UTC  Kenneth Tilton <ktilton@mcna.net>
` Re: Efficiency of EXISTS?
  2012-07-23 21:52 UTC  Merlin Moncure <mmoncure@gmail.com>
` Re: Efficiency of EXISTS?
  2012-07-23 22:12 UTC  Kenneth Tilton <ktilton@mcna.net>
  [3+ messages in thread]

High CPU Usage
  2012-06-14 15:15 UTC  Siddharth Shah <siddharth.shah@elitecore.com>
` Re: High CPU Usage
  2012-07-23 19:38 UTC  Robert Haas <robertmhaas@gmail.com>
  [2+ messages in thread]

postgres clustering interactions with pg_dump
  2012-06-11 13:55 UTC  Fitch, Britt <brittf@telenav.com>
` Re: postgres clustering interactions with pg_dump
  2012-07-23 19:07 UTC  Robert Haas <robertmhaas@gmail.com>
  [2+ messages in thread]

A very long running query....
  2012-07-20 21:19 UTC  Ioannis Anagnostopoulos <ioannis@anatec.com>
` Re: A very long running query....
  2012-07-20 21:23 UTC  Claudio Freire <klaussfreire@gmail.com>
` Re: A very long running query....
  2012-07-20 21:27 UTC  Ioannis Anagnostopoulos <ioannis@anatec.com>
` Re: A very long running query....
  2012-07-20 21:33 UTC  Rosser Schwarz <rosser.schwarz@gmail.com>
` Re: A very long running query....
  2012-07-20 21:33 UTC  Claudio Freire <klaussfreire@gmail.com>
` Re: A very long running query....
  2012-07-20 21:52 UTC  Ioannis Anagnostopoulos <ioannis@anatec.com>
` Re: A very long running query....
  2012-07-20 21:53 UTC  Ioannis Anagnostopoulos <ioannis@anatec.com>
` Re: A very long running query....
  2012-07-20 22:19 UTC  Ioannis Anagnostopoulos <ioannis@anatec.com>
` Re: A very long running query....
  2012-07-20 23:10 UTC  Tom Lane <tgl@sss.pgh.pa.us>
` Re: A very long running query....
  2012-07-20 23:56 UTC  Ioannis Anagnostopoulos <ioannis@anatec.com>
` Re: A very long running query....
  2012-07-21 08:02 UTC  Craig Ringer <ringerc@ringerc.id.au>
` Re: A very long running query....
  2012-07-21 09:16 UTC  Marc Mamin <M.Mamin@intershop.de>
` Re: A very long running query....
  2012-07-21 09:22 UTC  Ioannis Anagnostopoulos <ioannis@anatec.com>
` Re: A very long running query....
  2012-07-21 16:58 UTC  Tom Lane <tgl@sss.pgh.pa.us>
` Re: A very long running query....
  2012-07-21 17:42 UTC  Ioannis Anagnostopoulos <ioannis@anatec.com>
` Re: A very long running query....
  2012-07-21 19:16 UTC  Ioannis Anagnostopoulos <ioannis@anatec.com>
` Re: A very long running query....
  2012-07-21 19:19 UTC  Claudio Freire <klaussfreire@gmail.com>
` Re: A very long running query....
  2012-07-21 19:24 UTC  Ioannis Anagnostopoulos <ioannis@anatec.com>
` Re: A very long running query....
  2012-07-21 20:10 UTC  Claudio Freire <klaussfreire@gmail.com>
` Re: A very long running query....
  2012-07-21 20:11 UTC  Claudio Freire <klaussfreire@gmail.com>
` Re: A very long running query....
  2012-07-21 20:29 UTC  Ioannis Anagnostopoulos <ioannis@anatec.com>
  [21+ messages in thread]

queries are fast after dump->restore but slow again after some days dispite vacuum
  2012-07-19 11:33 UTC  Felix Scheicher <mandavi@web.de>
` Re: queries are fast after dump->restore but slow again after some days dispite vacuum
  2012-07-19 12:38 UTC  Andrew Dunstan <andrew@dunslane.net>
` Re: queries are fast after dump->restore but slow again after some days dispite vacuum
  2012-07-19 15:13 UTC  Felix Scheicher <mandavi@web.de>
` Re: queries are fast after dump->restore but slow again after some days dispite vacuum
  2012-07-19 15:48 UTC  Andrew Dunstan <andrew@dunslane.net>
` Re: queries are fast after dump->restore but slow again after some days dispite vacuum
  2012-07-19 16:12 UTC  Jeff Janes <jeff.janes@gmail.com>
` Re: queries are fast after dump->restore but slow again after some days dispite vacuum
  2012-07-19 17:04 UTC  Scott Marlowe <scott.marlowe@gmail.com>
` Re: queries are fast after dump->restore but slow again after some days dispite vacuum
  2012-07-19 17:24 UTC  mandavi <mandavi@web.de>
` Re: queries are fast after dump->restore but slow again after some days dispite vacuum
  2012-07-20 07:10 UTC  Laszlo Nagy <gandalf@shopzeus.com>
  [8+ messages in thread]

optimizing queries using IN and EXISTS
  2012-07-18 16:10 UTC  Nick Hofstede <Nick.Hofstede@inventivegroup.com>
` Re: optimizing queries using IN and EXISTS
  2012-07-18 18:40 UTC  Peter Geoghegan <peter@2ndquadrant.com>
` Re: optimizing queries using IN and EXISTS
  2012-07-18 20:28 UTC  Nick Hofstede <Nick.Hofstede@inventivegroup.com>
` Re: optimizing queries using IN and EXISTS
  2012-07-18 22:36 UTC  Tom Lane <tgl@sss.pgh.pa.us>
` Re: optimizing queries using IN and EXISTS
  2012-07-19 11:53 UTC  Nick Hofstede <Nick.Hofstede@inventivegroup.com>
  [5+ messages in thread]

Process 11812 still waiting for ExclusiveLock on extension of relation
  2012-07-17 15:57 UTC  David Kerr <dmk@mr-paradox.net>
` Re: Process 11812 still waiting for ExclusiveLock on extension of relation
  2012-07-18 12:08 UTC  Sergey Konoplev <sergey.konoplev@postgresql-consulting.com>
` Re: Process 11812 still waiting for ExclusiveLock on extension of relation
  2012-07-19 01:43 UTC  David Kerr <dmk@mr-paradox.net>
  [3+ messages in thread]

Sequencial scan in a JOIN
  2012-06-05 12:48 UTC  Andrew Jaimes <andrewjaimes@hotmail.com>
` Re: Sequencial scan in a JOIN
  2012-06-05 13:15 UTC  Shaun Thomas <sthomas@optionshouse.com>
` Re: Sequencial scan in a JOIN
  2012-06-05 13:31 UTC  Andrew Jaimes <andrewjaimes@hotmail.com>
` Re: Sequencial scan in a JOIN
  2012-06-05 14:02 UTC  Shaun Thomas <sthomas@optionshouse.com>
` Re: Sequencial scan in a JOIN
  2012-06-05 14:57 UTC  Shaun Thomas <sthomas@optionshouse.com>
` Re: Sequencial scan in a JOIN
  2012-07-18 20:00 UTC  Robert Haas <robertmhaas@gmail.com>
  [6+ messages in thread]

Array fundamentals
  2012-06-02 17:05 UTC  idc danny <idcdanny@yahoo.com>
` Re: [PERFORM] Array fundamentals
  2012-06-02 17:21 UTC  Jeff Davis <pgsql@j-davis.com>
` Re: Array fundamentals
  2012-07-18 19:32 UTC  Robert Haas <robertmhaas@gmail.com>
  [3+ messages in thread]

PostgreSQL db, 30 tables with number of rows < 100 (not huge) - the fastest way to clean each non-empty table and reset unique identifier column of empty ones.
  2012-07-03 15:22 UTC  Stanislaw Pankevich <s.pankevich@gmail.com>
` Re: PostgreSQL db, 30 tables with number of rows < 100 (not huge) - the fastest way to clean each non-empty table and reset unique identifier column of empty ones.
  2012-07-06 11:29 UTC  Craig Ringer <ringerc@ringerc.id.au>
` Re: PostgreSQL db, 30 tables with number of rows < 100 (not huge) - the fastest way to clean each non-empty table and reset unique identifier column of empty ones.
  2012-07-06 11:35 UTC  Craig Ringer <ringerc@ringerc.id.au>
` Re: PostgreSQL db, 30 tables with number of rows < 100 (not huge) - the fastest way to clean each non-empty table and reset unique identifier column of empty ones.
  2012-07-06 11:38 UTC  Daniel Farina <daniel@heroku.com>
` Re: PostgreSQL db, 30 tables with number of rows < 100 (not huge) - the fastest way to clean each non-empty table and reset unique identifier column of empty ones.
  2012-07-06 13:25 UTC  Stanislaw Pankevich <s.pankevich@gmail.com>
` Re: PostgreSQL db, 30 tables with number of rows < 100 (not huge) - the fastest way to clean each non-empty table and reset unique identifier column of empty ones.
  2012-07-06 13:30 UTC  Stanislaw Pankevich <s.pankevich@gmail.com>
` Re: PostgreSQL db, 30 tables with number of rows < 100 (not huge) - the fastest way to clean each non-empty table and reset unique identifier column of empty ones.
  2012-07-06 13:38 UTC  Craig Ringer <ringerc@ringerc.id.au>
` Re: PostgreSQL db, 30 tables with number of rows < 100 (not huge) - the fastest way to clean each non-empty table and reset unique identifier column of empty ones.
  2012-07-06 13:39 UTC  Albe Laurenz <laurenz.albe@wien.gv.at>
` Re: PostgreSQL db, 30 tables with number of rows < 100 (not huge) - the fastest way to clean each non-empty table and reset unique identifier column of empty ones.
  2012-07-06 13:45 UTC  Stanislaw Pankevich <s.pankevich@gmail.com>
` Re: PostgreSQL db, 30 tables with number of rows < 100 (not huge) - the fastest way to clean each non-empty table and reset unique identifier column of empty ones.
  2012-07-06 13:51 UTC  Stanislaw Pankevich <s.pankevich@gmail.com>
` Re: PostgreSQL db, 30 tables with number of rows < 100 (not huge) - the fastest way to clean each non-empty table and reset unique identifier column of empty ones.
  2012-07-06 14:14 UTC  Andres Freund <andres@2ndquadrant.com>
` Re: PostgreSQL db, 30 tables with number of rows < 100 (not huge) - the fastest way to clean each non-empty table and reset unique identifier column of empty ones.
  2012-07-06 14:22 UTC  Craig Ringer <ringerc@ringerc.id.au>
` Re: PostgreSQL db, 30 tables with number of rows < 100 (not huge) - the fastest way to clean each non-empty table and reset unique identifier column of empty ones.
  2012-07-06 14:46 UTC  Albe Laurenz <laurenz.albe@wien.gv.at>
` Re: PostgreSQL db, 30 tables with number of rows < 100 (not huge) - the fastest way to clean each non-empty table and reset unique identifier column of empty ones.
  2012-07-06 15:24 UTC  Marc Mamin <M.Mamin@intershop.de>
` Re: PostgreSQL db, 30 tables with number of rows < 100 (not huge) - the fastest way to clean each non-empty table and reset unique identifier column of empty ones.
  2012-07-06 15:27 UTC  Stanislaw Pankevich <s.pankevich@gmail.com>
` Re: PostgreSQL db, 30 tables with number of rows < 100 (not huge) - the fastest way to clean each non-empty table and reset unique identifier column of empty ones.
  2012-07-06 15:44 UTC  Stanislaw Pankevich <s.pankevich@gmail.com>
` Re: PostgreSQL db, 30 tables with number of rows < 100 (not huge) - the fastest way to clean each non-empty table and reset unique identifier column of empty ones.
  2012-07-06 15:57 UTC  Jeff Janes <jeff.janes@gmail.com>
` Re: PostgreSQL db, 30 tables with number of rows < 100 (not huge) - the fastest way to clean each non-empty table and reset unique identifier column of empty ones.
  2012-07-06 16:06 UTC  Steve Crawford <scrawford@pinpointresearch.com>
` Re: PostgreSQL db, 30 tables with number of rows < 100 (not huge) - the fastest way to clean each non-empty table and reset unique identifier column of empty ones.
  2012-07-06 18:32 UTC  Chris Hanks <christopher.m.hanks@gmail.com>
` Re: PostgreSQL db, 30 tables with number of rows < 100 (not huge) - the fastest way to clean each non-empty table and reset unique identifier column of empty ones.
  2012-07-13 07:50 UTC  Stanislaw Pankevich <s.pankevich@gmail.com>
` Re: PostgreSQL db, 30 tables with number of rows < 100 (not huge) - the fastest way to clean each non-empty table and reset unique identifier column of empty ones.
  2012-07-14 03:35 UTC  Craig Ringer <ringerc@ringerc.id.au>
` Re: PostgreSQL db, 30 tables with number of rows < 100 (not huge) - the fastest way to clean each non-empty table and reset unique identifier column of empty ones.
  2012-07-18 14:33 UTC  Merlin Moncure <mmoncure@gmail.com>
  [22+ messages in thread]

monitoring suggestions
  2012-07-18 14:27 UTC  Campbell, Lance <lance@illinois.edu>

postgresql query cost values/estimates
  2012-07-18 12:18 UTC  John Lister <john.lister@kickstone.com>

Slow application response on lightly loaded server?
  2012-07-17 16:27 UTC  Mike Blackwell <mike.blackwell@rrd.com>
` Re: Slow application response on lightly loaded server?
  2012-07-17 16:35 UTC  Scott Marlowe <scott.marlowe@gmail.com>
` Re: Slow application response on lightly loaded server?
  2012-07-17 17:37 UTC  Mike Blackwell <mike.blackwell@rrd.com>
` Re: Slow application response on lightly loaded server?
  2012-07-17 17:49 UTC  Scott Marlowe <scott.marlowe@gmail.com>
` Re: Slow application response on lightly loaded server?
  2012-07-17 18:10 UTC  Mike Blackwell <mike.blackwell@rrd.com>
` Re: Slow application response on lightly loaded server?
  2012-07-17 19:36 UTC  Scott Marlowe <scott.marlowe@gmail.com>
` Re: Slow application response on lightly loaded server?
  2012-07-17 19:48 UTC  Mike Blackwell <mike.blackwell@rrd.com>
` Re: Slow application response on lightly loaded server?
  2012-07-17 21:00 UTC  Scott Marlowe <scott.marlowe@gmail.com>
  [8+ messages in thread]

very very slow inserts into very large table
  2012-07-16 13:37 UTC  Jon Nelson <jnelson+pgsql@jamponi.net>
` Re: very very slow inserts into very large table
  2012-07-16 14:06 UTC  Mark Thornton <mthornton@optrak.com>
` Re: very very slow inserts into very large table
  2012-07-16 17:35 UTC  Samuel Gendler <sgendler@ideasculptor.com>
` Re: very very slow inserts into very large table
  2012-07-16 17:56 UTC  Jon Nelson <jnelson+pgsql@jamponi.net>
` Re: very very slow inserts into very large table
  2012-07-16 18:28 UTC  Jeff Janes <jeff.janes@gmail.com>
` Re: very very slow inserts into very large table
  2012-07-16 18:59 UTC  Mark Thornton <mthornton@optrak.com>
` Re: very very slow inserts into very large table
  2012-07-16 19:08 UTC  Claudio Freire <klaussfreire@gmail.com>
` Re: very very slow inserts into very large table
  2012-07-16 19:16 UTC  Mark Thornton <mthornton@optrak.com>
` Re: very very slow inserts into very large table
  2012-07-16 20:01 UTC  Claudio Freire <klaussfreire@gmail.com>
` Re: very very slow inserts into very large table
  2012-07-17 03:30 UTC  Craig Ringer <ringerc@ringerc.id.au>
` Re: very very slow inserts into very large table
  2012-07-17 03:49 UTC  Satoshi Nagayasu <snaga@uptime.jp>
` Re: very very slow inserts into very large table
  2012-07-17 15:59 UTC  Ants Aasma <ants@cybertec.at>
` Re: very very slow inserts into very large table
  2012-07-17 16:24 UTC  Jeff Janes <jeff.janes@gmail.com>
` Re: very very slow inserts into very large table
  2012-07-17 16:55 UTC  Claudio Freire <klaussfreire@gmail.com>
  [14+ messages in thread]

PostgreSQL index issue
  2012-07-12 00:03 UTC  codevally <codevally.mail.list@gmail.com>
` Re: PostgreSQL index issue
  2012-07-16 07:44 UTC  Albe Laurenz <laurenz.albe@wien.gv.at>
  [2+ messages in thread]

Proposed change for 9.3(?): Require full restart to change fsync parameter, not just pg_ctl reload
  2012-07-16 01:54 UTC  Craig Ringer <ringerc@ringerc.id.au>

Any tool/script available which can be used to measure scalability of an application's database.
  2012-07-10 08:21 UTC  Sreejith Balakrishnan <sreejith.balakrishnan@tcs.com>
` Re: Any tool/script available which can be used to measure scalability of an application's database.
  2012-07-13 18:37 UTC  Sergey Konoplev <gray.ru@gmail.com>
` Re: Any tool/script available which can be used to measure scalability of an application's database.
  2012-07-13 20:06 UTC  Robert Klemme <shortcutter@googlemail.com>
` Re: Any tool/script available which can be used to measure scalability of an application's database.
  2012-07-14 01:21 UTC  B Sreejith <bsreejithin@gmail.com>
` Re: Any tool/script available which can be used to measure scalability of an application's database.
  2012-07-14 01:26 UTC  B Sreejith <bsreejithin@gmail.com>
` Re: Any tool/script available which can be used to measure scalability of an application's database.
  2012-07-14 05:05 UTC  Craig Ringer <ringerc@ringerc.id.au>
` Re: Any tool/script available which can be used to measure scalability of an application's database.
  2012-07-14 08:48 UTC  Craig Ringer <ringerc@ringerc.id.au>
` Re: Any tool/script available which can be used to measure scalability of an application's database.
  2012-07-14 09:10 UTC  John Jones <idolchatter@gmail.com>
` Re: Any tool/script available which can be used to measure scalability of an application's database.
  2012-07-14 09:50 UTC  B Sreejith <bsreejithin@gmail.com>
` Re: Any tool/script available which can be used to measure scalability of an application's database.
  2012-07-14 12:17 UTC  Robert Klemme <shortcutter@googlemail.com>
` Re: Any tool/script available which can be used to measure scalability of an application's database.
  2012-07-14 12:49 UTC  Sergey Konoplev <sergey.konoplev@postgresql-consulting.com>
` Re: Any tool/script available which can be used to measure scalability of an application's database.
  2012-07-14 15:10 UTC  Craig Ringer <ringerc@ringerc.id.au>
  [12+ messages in thread]


[next (older)]

This inbox is served by DDX for PostgreSQL; see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox