pg.ddx.io  pgsql-performance@postgresql.org mailing list archive  
help / color / mirror / Atom feed
querying with index on jsonb slower than standard column. Why?
  2014-12-07 22:59 UTC  Tim Dudgeon <tdudgeon.ml@gmail.com>
` Re: querying with index on jsonb slower than standard column. Why?
  2014-12-08 00:19 UTC  Adrian Klaver <adrian.klaver@aklaver.com>
` Re: querying with index on jsonb slower than standard column. Why?
  2014-12-08 00:43 UTC  Tim Dudgeon <tdudgeon.ml@gmail.com>
` Re: querying with index on jsonb slower than standard column. Why?
  2014-12-08 00:53 UTC  Adrian Klaver <adrian.klaver@aklaver.com>
` Re: querying with index on jsonb slower than standard column. Why?
  2014-12-08 01:05 UTC  Tim Dudgeon <tdudgeon.ml@gmail.com>
` Re: querying with index on jsonb slower than standard column. Why?
  2014-12-08 01:15 UTC  Adrian Klaver <adrian.klaver@aklaver.com>
` Re: querying with index on jsonb slower than standard column. Why?
  2014-12-08 01:28 UTC  Tom Lane <tgl@sss.pgh.pa.us>
` Re: querying with index on jsonb slower than standard column. Why?
  2014-12-08 15:31 UTC  Adrian Klaver <adrian.klaver@aklaver.com>
` Re: querying with index on jsonb slower than standard column. Why?
  2014-12-08 15:46 UTC  Tom Lane <tgl@sss.pgh.pa.us>
` Re: querying with index on jsonb slower than standard column. Why?
  2014-12-08 15:50 UTC  Adrian Klaver <adrian.klaver@aklaver.com>
` Re: querying with index on jsonb slower than standard column. Why?
  2014-12-08 16:44 UTC  Adrian Klaver <adrian.klaver@aklaver.com>
` Re: querying with index on jsonb slower than standard column. Why?
  2014-12-08 16:56 UTC  Tom Lane <tgl@sss.pgh.pa.us>
` Re: [SQL] querying with index on jsonb slower than standard column. Why?
  2014-12-08 20:53 UTC  Tom Lane <tgl@sss.pgh.pa.us>
` Re: querying with index on jsonb slower than standard column. Why?
  2014-12-08 21:14 UTC  Adrian Klaver <adrian.klaver@aklaver.com>
` Re: [SQL] querying with index on jsonb slower than standard column. Why?
  2014-12-08 21:22 UTC  Tom Lane <tgl@sss.pgh.pa.us>
` Re: querying with index on jsonb slower than standard column. Why?
  2014-12-08 21:34 UTC  Adrian Klaver <adrian.klaver@aklaver.com>
` Re: [SQL] querying with index on jsonb slower than standard column. Why?
  2014-12-08 21:39 UTC  Tim Dudgeon <tdudgeon.ml@gmail.com>
` Re: Re: [SQL] querying with index on jsonb slower than standard column. Why?
  2014-12-12 21:24 UTC  Josh Berkus <josh@agliodbs.com>
` Re: Re: [SQL] querying with index on jsonb slower than standard column. Why?
  2014-12-12 21:44 UTC  Tom Lane <tgl@sss.pgh.pa.us>
` Re: [PERFORM] Re: querying with index on jsonb slower than standard column. Why?
  2014-12-12 22:10 UTC  Claudio Freire <klaussfreire@gmail.com>
` Re: Re: [SQL] querying with index on jsonb slower than standard column. Why?
  2014-12-12 23:27 UTC  Andrew Dunstan <andrew@dunslane.net>
` Re: Re: [SQL] querying with index on jsonb slower than standard column. Why?
  2014-12-13 01:20 UTC  Tom Lane <tgl@sss.pgh.pa.us>
` Re: Re: [SQL] querying with index on jsonb slower than standard column. Why?
  2014-12-13 03:05 UTC  Andrew Dunstan <andrew@dunslane.net>
` Re: Re: [SQL] querying with index on jsonb slower than standard column. Why?
  2014-12-13 05:38 UTC  Claudio Freire <klaussfreire@gmail.com>
  [24+ messages in thread]

When does PostgreSQL collapse subqueries to join?
  2014-12-10 11:31 UTC  Sven R. Kunze <srkunze@tbz-pariv.de>
` Re: When does PostgreSQL collapse subqueries to join?
  2014-12-10 15:34 UTC  Tom Lane <tgl@sss.pgh.pa.us>
  [2+ messages in thread]

Hardware Requirements
  2014-12-09 18:42 UTC  Vivekanand Joshi <vjoshi@zetainteractive.com>
` Re: Hardware Requirements
  2014-12-09 18:55 UTC  Claudio Freire <klaussfreire@gmail.com>
  [2+ messages in thread]

Query doesn't use index on hstore column
  2014-12-04 20:42 UTC  Michael Barker <mikeb01@gmail.com>
` Re: Query doesn't use index on hstore column
  2014-12-04 21:46 UTC  ktm@rice.edu <ktm@rice.edu>
` Re: Query doesn't use index on hstore column
  2014-12-05 01:32 UTC  Tom Lane <tgl@sss.pgh.pa.us>
` Re: Query doesn't use index on hstore column
  2014-12-06 00:05 UTC  Michael Barker <mikeb01@gmail.com>
  [4+ messages in thread]

issue in postgresql 9.1.3 in using arrow key in Solaris platform
  2014-11-26 10:16 UTC  M Tarkeshwar Rao <m.tarkeshwar.rao@ericsson.com>
` Re: issue in postgresql 9.1.3 in using arrow key in Solaris platform
  2014-11-26 14:37 UTC  Adrian Klaver <adrian.klaver@aklaver.com>
` Re: issue in postgresql 9.1.3 in using arrow key in Solaris platform
  2014-11-26 15:27 UTC  Tom Lane <tgl@sss.pgh.pa.us>
` Re: issue in postgresql 9.1.3 in using arrow key in Solaris platform
  2014-12-04 19:10 UTC  Josh Berkus <josh@agliodbs.com>
  [4+ messages in thread]

CTE query plan ignores selective index
  2014-12-02 20:59 UTC  Patrick Krecker <patrick@judicata.com>
` Re: CTE query plan ignores selective index
  2014-12-02 22:07 UTC  Tom Lane <tgl@sss.pgh.pa.us>
  [2+ messages in thread]

Small performance regression in 9.2 has a big impact
  2014-11-25 20:36 UTC  Scott Marlowe <scott.marlowe@gmail.com>
` Re: Small performance regression in 9.2 has a big impact
  2014-11-25 20:58 UTC  Heikki Linnakangas <hlinnakangas@vmware.com>
` Re: Small performance regression in 9.2 has a big impact
  2014-11-25 21:55 UTC  Tom Lane <tgl@sss.pgh.pa.us>
` Re: Small performance regression in 9.2 has a big impact
  2014-11-25 22:25 UTC  Scott Marlowe <scott.marlowe@gmail.com>
` Re: Small performance regression in 9.2 has a big impact
  2014-11-25 22:57 UTC  Tom Lane <tgl@sss.pgh.pa.us>
` Re: Small performance regression in 9.2 has a big impact
  2014-11-25 23:02 UTC  Tom Lane <tgl@sss.pgh.pa.us>
` Re: Small performance regression in 9.2 has a big impact
  2014-11-26 03:59 UTC  Tom Lane <tgl@sss.pgh.pa.us>
` Re: Small performance regression in 9.2 has a big impact
  2014-11-26 17:21 UTC  Scott Marlowe <scott.marlowe@gmail.com>
  [8+ messages in thread]

pgtune + configurations with 9.3
  2014-10-30 06:49 UTC  Tory M Blue <tmblue@gmail.com>
` Re: pgtune + configurations with 9.3
  2014-10-31 09:43 UTC  Albe Laurenz <laurenz.albe@wien.gv.at>
` Re: pgtune + configurations with 9.3
  2014-11-06 22:01 UTC  Josh Berkus <josh@agliodbs.com>
` Re: pgtune + configurations with 9.3
  2014-11-07 14:13 UTC  Shaun Thomas <sthomas@optionshouse.com>
` Re: pgtune + configurations with 9.3
  2014-11-14 16:28 UTC  Shaun Thomas <sthomas@optionshouse.com>
` [PERFORM] pgtune + configurations with 9.3
  2014-11-14 16:40 UTC  Alexey Vasiliev <leopard_ne@inbox.ru>
` Re: pgtune + configurations with 9.3
  2014-11-14 17:06 UTC  Shaun Thomas <sthomas@optionshouse.com>
` Re: pgtune + configurations with 9.3
  2014-11-14 23:00 UTC  Mark Kirkwood <mark.kirkwood@catalyst.net.nz>
` Re: pgtune + configurations with 9.3
  2014-11-15 02:08 UTC  Jim Nasby <Jim.Nasby@BlueTreble.com>
` Re: pgtune + configurations with 9.3
  2014-11-15 03:29 UTC  Mark Kirkwood <mark.kirkwood@catalyst.net.nz>
` Re: pgtune + configurations with 9.3
  2014-11-17 05:17 UTC  Stuart Bishop <stuart@stuartbishop.net>
` Re: pgtune + configurations with 9.3
  2014-11-24 07:01 UTC  Johann Spies <johann.spies@gmail.com>
` Re: pgtune + configurations with 9.3
  2014-11-26 13:34 UTC  Johann Spies <johann.spies@gmail.com>
` Re: pgtune + configurations with 9.3
  2014-11-26 13:39 UTC  Johann Spies <johann.spies@gmail.com>
  [14+ messages in thread]

Why don't use index on x when ORDER BY x, y?
  2014-11-24 11:02 UTC  Vlad Arkhipov <arhipov@dc.baikal.ru>
` Re: Why don't use index on x when ORDER BY x, y?
  2014-11-24 13:39 UTC  Robert Klemme <shortcutter@googlemail.com>
` Re: Why don't use index on x when ORDER BY x, y?
  2014-11-24 15:38 UTC  Tom Lane <tgl@sss.pgh.pa.us>
  [3+ messages in thread]

A pessimistic planner
  2014-11-21 05:07 UTC  Stuart Bishop <stuart@stuartbishop.net>
` Re: A pessimistic planner
  2014-11-21 05:12 UTC  Tom Lane <tgl@sss.pgh.pa.us>
  [2+ messages in thread]

Plan uses wrong index, preferring to scan pkey index instead
  2014-11-15 23:16 UTC  Yuri Kunde Schlesner <yuriks+lists@yuriks.net>
` Re: Plan uses wrong index, preferring to scan pkey index instead
  2014-11-15 23:24 UTC  Yuri Kunde Schlesner <yuriks+lists@yuriks.net>
` Re: Plan uses wrong index, preferring to scan pkey index instead
  2014-11-16 17:18 UTC  Tom Lane <tgl@sss.pgh.pa.us>
` Re: Plan uses wrong index, preferring to scan pkey index instead
  2014-11-19 00:02 UTC  Yuri Kunde Schlesner <yuriks+lists@yuriks.net>
  [4+ messages in thread]

Partitions and work_mem?
  2014-10-14 17:08 UTC  Dave Johansen <davejohansen@gmail.com>
` Re: Partitions and work_mem?
  2014-10-14 18:29 UTC  Jeff Janes <jeff.janes@gmail.com>
` Re: Partitions and work_mem?
  2014-10-15 17:10 UTC  Josh Berkus <josh@agliodbs.com>
` Re: Partitions and work_mem?
  2014-10-15 20:05 UTC  Dave Johansen <davejohansen@gmail.com>
` Re: Partitions and work_mem?
  2014-10-15 20:08 UTC  Igor Neyman <ineyman@perceptron.com>
` Re: Partitions and work_mem?
  2014-10-15 20:19 UTC  Dave Johansen <davejohansen@gmail.com>
` Re: Partitions and work_mem?
  2014-10-15 20:36 UTC  Igor Neyman <ineyman@perceptron.com>
` Re: Partitions and work_mem?
  2014-10-15 20:49 UTC  Dave Johansen <davejohansen@gmail.com>
` Re: Partitions and work_mem?
  2014-10-15 21:00 UTC  Igor Neyman <ineyman@perceptron.com>
` Re: Partitions and work_mem?
  2014-10-15 22:25 UTC  Josh Berkus <josh@agliodbs.com>
` Re: Partitions and work_mem?
  2014-10-15 22:58 UTC  Tom Lane <tgl@sss.pgh.pa.us>
` Re: Partitions and work_mem?
  2014-11-16 22:25 UTC  Dave Johansen <davejohansen@gmail.com>
` Re: Partitions and work_mem?
  2014-11-17 06:57 UTC  Magnus Hagander <magnus@hagander.net>
` Re: Partitions and work_mem?
  2014-11-17 15:13 UTC  Tom Lane <tgl@sss.pgh.pa.us>
` Re: Partitions and work_mem?
  2014-11-18 03:34 UTC  Dave Johansen <davejohansen@gmail.com>
  [15+ messages in thread]

 Re[2]: [PERFORM] pgtune + configurations with 9.3
  2014-11-14 14:23 UTC  Alexey Vasiliev <leopard_ne@inbox.ru>
`  Re[2]: [PERFORM] pgtune + configurations with 9.3
  2014-11-14 19:10 UTC  Alexey Vasiliev <leopard_ne@inbox.ru>
` Re: Re[2]: [PERFORM] pgtune + configurations with 9.3
  2014-11-17 04:52 UTC  Stuart Bishop <stuart@stuartbishop.net>
  [3+ messages in thread]

Index order ignored after `is null` in query
  2014-11-03 01:40 UTC  Artūras Lapinskas <arturaslape@gmail.com>
` Index order ignored after `is null` in query
  2014-11-05 21:42 UTC  Artūras Lapinskas <arturaslape@gmail.com>
` Re: Index order ignored after `is null` in query
  2014-11-06 17:06 UTC  Artūras Lapinskas <arturaslape@gmail.com>
` Re: Index order ignored after `is null` in query
  2014-11-06 17:23 UTC  Tom Lane <tgl@sss.pgh.pa.us>
` Re: Index order ignored after `is null` in query
  2014-11-07 11:14 UTC  Artūras Lapinskas <arturaslape@gmail.com>
` Re: Index order ignored after `is null` in query
  2014-11-15 02:12 UTC  Jim Nasby <Jim.Nasby@BlueTreble.com>
  [6+ messages in thread]

updating statistics on slow running query
  2014-11-10 17:43 UTC  Eric Ramirez <eric.ramirez.sv@gmail.com>
` Re: updating statistics on slow running query
  2014-11-10 18:57 UTC  desmodemone <desmodemone@gmail.com>
` Re: updating statistics on slow running query
  2014-11-10 22:52 UTC  Eric Ramirez <eric.ramirez.sv@gmail.com>
` Re: updating statistics on slow running query
  2014-11-15 01:53 UTC  Jim Nasby <Jim.Nasby@BlueTreble.com>
  [4+ messages in thread]

9.0 performance degradation with kernel 3.11
  2014-11-13 08:10 UTC  Filip Rembiałkowski <filip.rembialkowski@gmail.com>
` Re: 9.0 performance degradation with kernel 3.11
  2014-11-14 16:08 UTC  Glyn Astill <glynastill@yahoo.co.uk>
  [2+ messages in thread]

Increased shared_buffer setting = lower hit ratio ?
  2014-11-13 23:09 UTC  CS DBA <cs_dba@consistentstate.com>
` Re: Increased shared_buffer setting = lower hit ratio ?
  2014-11-13 23:16 UTC  CS DBA <cs_dba@consistentstate.com>
` Re: Increased shared_buffer setting = lower hit ratio ?
  2014-11-13 23:35 UTC  Tomas Vondra <tv@fuzzy.cz>
` Re: Increased shared_buffer setting = lower hit ratio ?
  2014-11-14 00:01 UTC  Jeff Janes <jeff.janes@gmail.com>
  [4+ messages in thread]

Lock pileup causes server to stall
  2014-11-10 19:50 UTC  Josh Berkus <josh@agliodbs.com>
` Re: Lock pileup causes server to stall
  2014-11-10 21:40 UTC  Alvaro Herrera <alvherre@2ndquadrant.com>
` Re: Lock pileup causes server to stall
  2014-11-11 17:11 UTC  Josh Berkus <josh@agliodbs.com>
` Re: Lock pileup causes server to stall
  2014-11-11 17:33 UTC  Jeff Janes <jeff.janes@gmail.com>
` Re: Lock pileup causes server to stall
  2014-11-12 06:49 UTC  Jesper Krogh <jesper@krogh.cc>
` Re: Lock pileup causes server to stall
  2014-11-12 13:51 UTC  Alvaro Herrera <alvherre@2ndquadrant.com>
` Re: Lock pileup causes server to stall
  2014-11-12 17:04 UTC  Josh Berkus <josh@agliodbs.com>
` Re: Lock pileup causes server to stall
  2014-11-13 06:53 UTC  Jesper Krogh <jesper@krogh.cc>
  [8+ messages in thread]

trigger Before or After
  2014-11-11 06:38 UTC  avpro avpro <avprowebeden@gmail.com>
` Re: [GENERAL] trigger Before or After
  2014-11-11 08:19 UTC  Albe Laurenz <laurenz.albe@wien.gv.at>
` Re: trigger Before or After
  2014-11-11 13:58 UTC  Adrian Klaver <adrian.klaver@aklaver.com>
  [3+ messages in thread]

Performance bug in prepared statement binding in 9.2?
  2013-05-30 00:14 UTC  Josh Berkus <josh@agliodbs.com>
` Re: Performance bug in prepared statement binding in 9.2?
  2013-05-30 00:59 UTC  Josh Berkus <josh@agliodbs.com>
` Re: Performance bug in prepared statement binding in 9.2?
  2013-05-30 13:55 UTC  Amit Kapila <amit.kapila@huawei.com>
` Re: Performance bug in prepared statement binding in 9.2?
  2013-05-30 18:06 UTC  Josh Berkus <josh@agliodbs.com>
` Re: Performance bug in prepared statement binding in 9.2?
  2013-05-30 20:18 UTC  Josh Berkus <josh@agliodbs.com>
` Re: Performance bug in prepared statement binding in 9.2?
  2013-05-31 07:39 UTC  Amit Kapila <amit.kapila@huawei.com>
` Re: Performance bug in prepared statement binding in 9.2?
  2013-05-31 18:54 UTC  Josh Berkus <josh@agliodbs.com>
` Re: Performance bug in prepared statement binding in 9.2?
  2013-08-01 17:58 UTC  Josh Berkus <josh@agliodbs.com>
` Re: Performance bug in prepared statement binding in 9.2?
  2013-08-01 19:20 UTC  Jeff Janes <jeff.janes@gmail.com>
` Re: Performance bug in prepared statement binding in 9.2?
  2013-09-10 00:38 UTC  Andrew Dunstan <andrew@dunslane.net>
` Re: Performance bug in prepared statement binding in 9.2?
  2013-09-10 01:04 UTC  Bruce Momjian <bruce@momjian.us>
` Re: Performance bug in prepared statement binding in 9.2?
  2013-09-10 01:36 UTC  Mel Llaguno <mllaguno@coverity.com>
` Re: Performance bug in prepared statement binding in 9.2?
  2013-09-10 01:45 UTC  Bruce Momjian <bruce@momjian.us>
` Re: Performance bug in prepared statement binding in 9.2?
  2013-09-10 02:06 UTC  Mel Llaguno <mllaguno@coverity.com>
` Re: Performance bug in prepared statement binding in 9.2?
  2013-09-10 02:16 UTC  Bruce Momjian <bruce@momjian.us>
` Re: Performance bug in prepared statement binding in 9.2?
  2013-09-10 05:43 UTC  Mel Llaguno <mllaguno@coverity.com>
` Re: Performance bug in prepared statement binding in 9.2?
  2013-09-10 11:50 UTC  Bruce Momjian <bruce@momjian.us>
` Re: Performance bug in prepared statement binding in 9.2?
  2013-09-10 12:20 UTC  Andres Freund <andres@2ndquadrant.com>
` Re: Performance bug in prepared statement binding in 9.2?
  2013-09-10 12:32 UTC  Andres Freund <andres@2ndquadrant.com>
` Re: Performance bug in prepared statement binding in 9.2?
  2013-09-10 12:45 UTC  Andrew Dunstan <andrew@dunslane.net>
` Re: Performance bug in prepared statement binding in 9.2?
  2013-09-10 13:21 UTC  Andres Freund <andres@2ndquadrant.com>
` Re: Performance bug in prepared statement binding in 9.2?
  2013-09-10 13:23 UTC  Andres Freund <andres@2ndquadrant.com>
` Re: Performance bug in prepared statement binding in 9.2?
  2013-09-10 13:41 UTC  Andrew Dunstan <andrew@dunslane.net>
` Re: Performance bug in prepared statement binding in 9.2?
  2013-09-11 18:35 UTC  Josh Berkus <josh@agliodbs.com>
` Re: Performance bug in prepared statement binding in 9.2?
  2013-09-11 19:06 UTC  Andrew Dunstan <andrew@dunslane.net>
` Re: Performance bug in prepared statement binding in 9.2?
  2013-09-11 21:10 UTC  Andres Freund <andres@2ndquadrant.com>
` Re: Performance bug in prepared statement binding in 9.2?
  2013-09-11 21:12 UTC  Andres Freund <andres@2ndquadrant.com>
` Re: Performance bug in prepared statement binding in 9.2?
  2013-09-12 02:03 UTC  Josh Berkus <josh@agliodbs.com>
` Re: Performance bug in prepared statement binding in 9.2?
  2013-09-25 06:38 UTC  Jeff Janes <jeff.janes@gmail.com>
` Re: Performance bug in prepared statement binding in 9.2?
  2013-11-08 19:46 UTC  Tom Lane <tgl@sss.pgh.pa.us>
` Re: Performance bug in prepared statement binding in 9.2?
  2013-11-09 16:30 UTC  Kevin Grittner <kgrittn@ymail.com>
` Re: Performance bug in prepared statement binding in 9.2?
  2013-11-13 01:46 UTC  Tom Lane <tgl@sss.pgh.pa.us>
` Re: Performance bug in prepared statement binding in 9.2?
  2013-11-13 19:34 UTC  Josh Berkus <josh@agliodbs.com>
` Re: Performance bug in prepared statement binding in 9.2?
  2013-11-13 20:14 UTC  Tom Lane <tgl@sss.pgh.pa.us>
` Re: Performance bug in prepared statement binding in 9.2?
  2013-12-31 17:55 UTC  Tom Lane <tgl@sss.pgh.pa.us>
` Re: Performance bug in prepared statement binding in 9.2?
  2014-11-10 18:48 UTC  Josh Berkus <josh@agliodbs.com>
` Re: Performance bug in prepared statement binding in 9.2?
  2014-11-10 18:59 UTC  Jeff Janes <jeff.janes@gmail.com>
` Re: Performance bug in prepared statement binding in 9.2?
  2014-11-10 19:04 UTC  Josh Berkus <josh@agliodbs.com>
` Re: Performance bug in prepared statement binding in 9.2?
  2014-11-10 19:08 UTC  Andres Freund <andres@2ndquadrant.com>
` Re: Performance bug in prepared statement binding in 9.2?
  2014-11-10 19:11 UTC  Tom Lane <tgl@sss.pgh.pa.us>
` Re: Performance bug in prepared statement binding in 9.2?
  2014-11-10 19:34 UTC  Josh Berkus <josh@agliodbs.com>
` Re: Performance bug in prepared statement binding in 9.2?
  2014-11-10 20:13 UTC  Jeff Janes <jeff.janes@gmail.com>
` Re: Performance bug in prepared statement binding in 9.2?
  2014-11-10 23:51 UTC  Josh Berkus <josh@agliodbs.com>
  [43+ messages in thread]

9.3 performance issues, lots of bind and parse log entries
  2014-11-04 17:01 UTC  Tory M Blue <tmblue@gmail.com>
` Re: 9.3 performance issues, lots of bind and parse log entries
  2014-11-04 20:07 UTC  Tory M Blue <tmblue@gmail.com>
` Re: 9.3 performance issues, lots of bind and parse log entries
  2014-11-04 20:31 UTC  Tomas Vondra <tv@fuzzy.cz>
` Re: 9.3 performance issues, lots of bind and parse log entries
  2014-11-05 19:16 UTC  Tory M Blue <tmblue@gmail.com>
` Re: 9.3 performance issues, lots of bind and parse log entries
  2014-11-06 01:54 UTC  Tomas Vondra <tv@fuzzy.cz>
` Re: 9.3 performance issues, lots of bind and parse log entries
  2014-11-10 18:56 UTC  Josh Berkus <josh@agliodbs.com>
  [6+ messages in thread]

Postgres does not use indexes with OR-conditions
  2014-11-07 04:16 UTC  arhipov <arhipov@dc.baikal.ru>
` Re: Postgres does not use indexes with OR-conditions
  2014-11-07 04:38 UTC  David Rowley <dgrowleyml@gmail.com>
` Re: Postgres does not use indexes with OR-conditions
  2014-11-07 05:06 UTC  Vlad Arkhipov <arhipov@dc.baikal.ru>
` Re: Postgres does not use indexes with OR-conditions
  2014-11-07 13:55 UTC  Andrew Dunstan <andrew@dunslane.net>
` Re: Postgres does not use indexes with OR-conditions
  2014-11-07 14:17 UTC  Kevin Grittner <kgrittn@ymail.com>
` Re: Postgres does not use indexes with OR-conditions
  2014-11-07 15:11 UTC  Tom Lane <tgl@sss.pgh.pa.us>
` Re: Postgres does not use indexes with OR-conditions
  2014-11-07 16:50 UTC  David G Johnston <david.g.johnston@gmail.com>
  [7+ messages in thread]

log_temp_files (integer), tuning work_mem
  2014-11-05 21:32 UTC  Tory M Blue <tmblue@gmail.com>
` Re: log_temp_files (integer), tuning work_mem
  2014-11-06 06:31 UTC  Guillaume Lelarge <guillaume@lelarge.info>
  [2+ messages in thread]

Incredibly slow restore times after 9.0>9.2 upgrade
  2014-10-28 20:55 UTC  jmcdonagh <Joseph.E.McDonagh@gmail.com>
` Re: Incredibly slow restore times after 9.0>9.2 upgrade
  2014-10-28 21:19 UTC  Tomas Vondra <tv@fuzzy.cz>
` Re: Incredibly slow restore times after 9.0>9.2 upgrade
  2014-10-29 15:12 UTC  jmcdonagh <Joseph.E.McDonagh@gmail.com>
` Re: Incredibly slow restore times after 9.0>9.2 upgrade
  2014-10-29 15:34 UTC  Mathis, Jason <jmathis@enova.com>
` Re: Incredibly slow restore times after 9.0>9.2 upgrade
  2014-10-29 16:33 UTC  jmcdonagh <Joseph.E.McDonagh@gmail.com>
` Re: Incredibly slow restore times after 9.0>9.2 upgrade
  2014-10-30 16:23 UTC  jmcdonagh <Joseph.E.McDonagh@gmail.com>
` Re: Incredibly slow restore times after 9.0>9.2 upgrade
  2014-10-30 16:58 UTC  Jerry Sievers <gsievers19@comcast.net>
` Re: Incredibly slow restore times after 9.0>9.2 upgrade
  2014-10-30 19:08 UTC  Tomas Vondra <tv@fuzzy.cz>
` Re: Incredibly slow restore times after 9.0>9.2 upgrade
  2014-11-04 16:28 UTC  jmcdonagh <Joseph.E.McDonagh@gmail.com>
` Re: Incredibly slow restore times after 9.0>9.2 upgrade
  2014-11-04 18:59 UTC  jmcdonagh <Joseph.E.McDonagh@gmail.com>
  [10+ messages in thread]

unnecessary sort in the execution plan when doing group by
  2014-10-28 06:26 UTC  Huang, Suya <Suya.Huang@au.experian.com>
` Re: unnecessary sort in the execution plan when doing group by
  2014-10-28 07:06 UTC  David Rowley <dgrowleyml@gmail.com>
` Re: unnecessary sort in the execution plan when doing group by
  2014-10-28 23:43 UTC  Huang, Suya <Suya.Huang@au.experian.com>
` Re: unnecessary sort in the execution plan when doing group by
  2014-11-04 16:02 UTC  Simon Riggs <simon@2ndQuadrant.com>
  [4+ messages in thread]


[next (older)]

This inbox is served by DDX for PostgreSQL; see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox