public inbox for [email protected]
help / color / mirror / Atom feedFrom: Pavel Stehule <[email protected]>
To: Bruce Momjian <[email protected]>
Cc: Laurenz Albe <[email protected]>
Cc: Daniel Gustafsson <[email protected]>
Cc: Marcos Pegoraro <[email protected]>
Cc: jian he <[email protected]>
Cc: Dmitry Dolgov <[email protected]>
Cc: Erik Rijkers <[email protected]>
Cc: Michael Paquier <[email protected]>
Cc: Amit Kapila <[email protected]>
Cc: DUVAL REMI <[email protected]>
Cc: PostgreSQL Hackers <[email protected]>
Subject: Re: proposal: schema variables
Date: Wed, 21 May 2025 07:15:27 +0200
Message-ID: <CAFj8pRAp1pWvJQ6uP_RDFMFRZfDqGz7beHGz0+eZJQ6o8nzv=Q@mail.gmail.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <[email protected]>
References: <CAFj8pRArtw+Qqzk+Zf2NxjgO=paCBdc54eEma+MsVwtx3j7Atg@mail.gmail.com>
<CAFj8pRAK_8ym1J=SAdin-vtL0PAachXgjWgU3QrhzinRdBX2sw@mail.gmail.com>
<CAFj8pRAx-Gb9Ux825cxGNm38qQUOrij1GY6erPRaQ=cpqfiX7g@mail.gmail.com>
<CAFj8pRCEjG005L=1vGbir-odYdcYxByOAeFVJ_K9eRcRF=MbNQ@mail.gmail.com>
<[email protected]>
<CAB-JLwY2-Hm_SYbj2td_VKuU8awCwgDr-sOtjHRE2C-Sgg_pFg@mail.gmail.com>
<[email protected]>
<[email protected]>
<[email protected]>
<[email protected]>
<[email protected]>
út 20. 5. 2025 v 23:07 odesílatel Bruce Momjian <[email protected]> napsal:
> On Tue, May 20, 2025 at 10:36:54PM +0200, Laurenz Albe wrote:
> > On Tue, 2025-05-20 at 16:28 -0400, Bruce Momjian wrote:
> > > Well, we do have a right, e.g., we would not allow someone to
> repeatedly
> > > post patches for a Postgres extension we don't manage, or the jdbc
> > > driver. I also don't think we would allow someone to continue posting
> > > patches for a feature we have decided to reject, and I think we have
> > > decided to reject the patch in in its current form. I think we might
> > > accept a trimmed-down version, but I don't see the patch moving in that
> > > direction.
> > >
> > > Now, of course, if I am the only one who feels this way, I can suppress
> > > these emails on my end.
> >
> > In my opinion, this patch set is adding something that would be valuable
> to
> > have in core.
> >
> > If no committer intends to pick it up and commit it, I think the proper
> > action would be to step up and reject the patch set, not complain about
> the
> > insistence of the author.
>
> Are you saying I should not complain until we have officially rejected
> the patch set? If we officially reject it, the patch author would no
> longer post it?
>
I'll respect committers. I really don't want to worry people in the
community. It is not my way, and I am sorry.
I think this is an important feature - for some group of developers, and
then I push my energy and time for this.
On the other hand, I accept that there is a lot of work that is important
for a wider group of users. So it is. Unfortunately,
without parser's hooks this feature cannot be implemented as an extension.
But parser's hooks was proposed,
and rejected, so there is no other possibility, how to do it. More -
implementation of this feature as an extension is not
best way.
regards
Pavel
>
> --
> Bruce Momjian <[email protected]> https://momjian.us
> EDB https://enterprisedb.com
>
> Do not let urgent matters crowd out time for investment in the future.
>
view thread (439+ messages) latest in thread
reply
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Reply to all the recipients using the --to and --cc options:
reply via email
To: [email protected]
Cc: [email protected], [email protected], [email protected], [email protected], [email protected], [email protected], [email protected], [email protected], [email protected], [email protected], [email protected], [email protected]
Subject: Re: proposal: schema variables
In-Reply-To: <CAFj8pRAp1pWvJQ6uP_RDFMFRZfDqGz7beHGz0+eZJQ6o8nzv=Q@mail.gmail.com>
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
This inbox is served by agora; see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox