public inbox for [email protected]  
help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: Bruce Momjian <[email protected]>
To: Laurenz Albe <[email protected]>
Cc: Daniel Gustafsson <[email protected]>
Cc: Marcos Pegoraro <[email protected]>
Cc: Pavel Stehule <[email protected]>
Cc: jian he <[email protected]>
Cc: Dmitry Dolgov <[email protected]>
Cc: Erik Rijkers <[email protected]>
Cc: Michael Paquier <[email protected]>
Cc: Amit Kapila <[email protected]>
Cc: DUVAL REMI <[email protected]>
Cc: PostgreSQL Hackers <[email protected]>
Subject: Re: proposal: schema variables
Date: Tue, 20 May 2025 17:06:59 -0400
Message-ID: <[email protected]> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <[email protected]>
References: <CAFj8pRArtw+Qqzk+Zf2NxjgO=paCBdc54eEma+MsVwtx3j7Atg@mail.gmail.com>
	<CAFj8pRAK_8ym1J=SAdin-vtL0PAachXgjWgU3QrhzinRdBX2sw@mail.gmail.com>
	<CAFj8pRAx-Gb9Ux825cxGNm38qQUOrij1GY6erPRaQ=cpqfiX7g@mail.gmail.com>
	<CAFj8pRCEjG005L=1vGbir-odYdcYxByOAeFVJ_K9eRcRF=MbNQ@mail.gmail.com>
	<[email protected]>
	<CAB-JLwY2-Hm_SYbj2td_VKuU8awCwgDr-sOtjHRE2C-Sgg_pFg@mail.gmail.com>
	<[email protected]>
	<[email protected]>
	<[email protected]>
	<[email protected]>

On Tue, May 20, 2025 at 10:36:54PM +0200, Laurenz Albe wrote:
> On Tue, 2025-05-20 at 16:28 -0400, Bruce Momjian wrote:
> > Well, we do have a right, e.g., we would not allow someone to repeatedly
> > post patches for a Postgres extension we don't manage, or the jdbc
> > driver.  I also don't think we would allow someone to continue posting
> > patches for a feature we have decided to reject, and I think we have
> > decided to reject the patch in in its current form.  I think we might
> > accept a trimmed-down version, but I don't see the patch moving in that
> > direction.
> > 
> > Now, of course, if I am the only one who feels this way, I can suppress
> > these emails on my end.
> 
> In my opinion, this patch set is adding something that would be valuable to
> have in core.
> 
> If no committer intends to pick it up and commit it, I think the proper
> action would be to step up and reject the patch set, not complain about the
> insistence of the author.

Are you saying I should not complain until we have officially rejected
the patch set?  If we officially reject it, the patch author would no
longer post it?

-- 
  Bruce Momjian  <[email protected]>        https://momjian.us
  EDB                                      https://enterprisedb.com

  Do not let urgent matters crowd out time for investment in the future.





view thread (439+ messages)  latest in thread

reply

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Reply to all the recipients using the --to and --cc options:
  reply via email

  To: [email protected]
  Cc: [email protected], [email protected], [email protected], [email protected], [email protected], [email protected], [email protected], [email protected], [email protected], [email protected], [email protected], [email protected]
  Subject: Re: proposal: schema variables
  In-Reply-To: <[email protected]>

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

This inbox is served by agora; see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox