public inbox for [email protected]  

help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: Pavel Stehule <[email protected]>
To: Laurenz Albe <[email protected]>
Cc: Bruce Momjian <[email protected]>
Cc: Daniel Gustafsson <[email protected]>
Cc: Marcos Pegoraro <[email protected]>
Cc: jian he <[email protected]>
Cc: Dmitry Dolgov <[email protected]>
Cc: Erik Rijkers <[email protected]>
Cc: Michael Paquier <[email protected]>
Cc: Amit Kapila <[email protected]>
Cc: DUVAL REMI <[email protected]>
Cc: PostgreSQL Hackers <[email protected]>
Subject: Re: proposal: schema variables
Date: Wed, 21 May 2025 08:36:45 +0200
Message-ID: <CAFj8pRBNQCycGvGjxKumEgKL+Dqxm8QXY-v0xhBVm+0T3Snbgg@mail.gmail.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <[email protected]>
References: <CAFj8pRArtw+Qqzk+Zf2NxjgO=paCBdc54eEma+MsVwtx3j7Atg@mail.gmail.com>
	<CAFj8pRAK_8ym1J=SAdin-vtL0PAachXgjWgU3QrhzinRdBX2sw@mail.gmail.com>
	<CAFj8pRAx-Gb9Ux825cxGNm38qQUOrij1GY6erPRaQ=cpqfiX7g@mail.gmail.com>
	<CAFj8pRCEjG005L=1vGbir-odYdcYxByOAeFVJ_K9eRcRF=MbNQ@mail.gmail.com>
	<[email protected]>
	<CAB-JLwY2-Hm_SYbj2td_VKuU8awCwgDr-sOtjHRE2C-Sgg_pFg@mail.gmail.com>
	<[email protected]>
	<[email protected]>
	<[email protected]>
	<[email protected]>
	<[email protected]>
	<[email protected]>

st 21. 5. 2025 v 8:27 odesílatel Laurenz Albe <[email protected]>
napsal:

> On Tue, 2025-05-20 at 17:06 -0400, Bruce Momjian wrote:
> > f no committer intends to pick it up and commit it, I think the proper
> > > action would be to step up and reject the patch set, not complain
> about the
> > > insistence of the author.
> >
> > Are you saying I should not complain until we have officially rejected
> > the patch set?  If we officially reject it, the patch author would no
> > longer post it?
>
> No, you are free to complain, just as Pavel is free to keep his patch
> set from rotting.  What I am trying to say is that rejecting the patch
> set is the most effective way to complain.
>
> The current state is that Pavel keeps the patch set alive, and occasionally
> people review it or parts of it.  But no committer is accepting or
> rejecting
> it, so the patch set remains in limbo.  This annoys you, and it is
> certainly
> not a happy experience for the author.  Rejection is not nice, but at least
> it would make it easier for Pavel to move on and spend his energy
> elsewhere.
>

Rejection is not nice, but it can be, and if it will be, I hope, there will
be more cleaner
status if we want this feature or not, and if possibly want this feature,
what we expect.

This feature can be designed differently in respect to some priorities. But
without known
priorities, any patch, proposal can end in the same state.

Regards

Pavel



>
> Yours,
> Laurenz Albe
>


view thread (439+ messages)  latest in thread

reply
Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Reply to all the recipients using the --to and --cc options:
  reply via email

  To: [email protected]
  Cc: [email protected], [email protected], [email protected], [email protected], [email protected], [email protected], [email protected], [email protected], [email protected], [email protected], [email protected], [email protected]
  Subject: Re: proposal: schema variables
  In-Reply-To: <CAFj8pRBNQCycGvGjxKumEgKL+Dqxm8QXY-v0xhBVm+0T3Snbgg@mail.gmail.com>

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

This inbox is served by agora; see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox