From: Merlin Moncure <mmoncure@gmail.com>
To: Amber <guxiaobo1982@hotmail.com>
Cc: Andrew Sullivan <ajs@commandprompt.com>
Cc: pgsql-general@postgresql.org
Subject: Re: PostgreSQL TPC-H test result?
Date: Tue, 9 Sep 2008 11:35:16 -0400
Message-ID: <b42b73150809090835m6e7781f1uf4ba76fd889447d3@mail.gmail.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <BLU139-DS28D9D90A25BD2AD8CDEF0CD540@phx.gbl>
References: <BLU139-DS5AB90A6E11E3F439F0006CD540@phx.gbl>
<20080909123947.GA59092@commandprompt.com>
<BLU139-DS28D9D90A25BD2AD8CDEF0CD540@phx.gbl>
On Tue, Sep 9, 2008 at 10:06 AM, Amber <guxiaobo1982@hotmail.com> wrote:
> Yes, we don't care about the performance results, but we do care about the point that PostgreSQL can't give the correct results of TPC-H queries.
PostgreSQL, at least in terms of the open source databases, is
probably your best bet if you are all concerned about correctness. Do
not give any credence to a vendor published benchmark unless the test
is published and can be independently verifed.
merlin
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Reply to all the recipients using the --to and --cc options:
reply via email
To: pgsql-performance@postgresql.org
Cc: mmoncure@gmail.com, guxiaobo1982@hotmail.com, ajs@commandprompt.com, pgsql-general@postgresql.org
Subject: Re: PostgreSQL TPC-H test result?
In-Reply-To: <b42b73150809090835m6e7781f1uf4ba76fd889447d3@mail.gmail.com>
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
This inbox is served by DDX for PostgreSQL; see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox