From: Jaime Casanova <systemguards@gmail.com>
To: Kyle Cordes <kyle@kylecordes.com>
Cc: pgsql-performance@postgresql.org
Subject: Re: Overriding the optimizer
Date: Fri, 16 Dec 2005 09:45:34 -0500
Message-ID: <c2d9e70e0512160645q20ca27b7ja2f1235bed797747@mail.gmail.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <43A2CCEF.9030605@kylecordes.com>
References: <200512141603.52583.blargity@gmail.com>
<1134629567.14248.27.camel@firebolt>
<200512150148.16125.blargity@gmail.com>
<1134644526.14248.60.camel@firebolt>
<43A1C40D.8040006@paradise.net.nz>
<43A1F6DB.3080805@modgraph-usa.com>
<43A226E7.7040508@paradise.net.nz>
<43A22BE3.6020103@modgraph-usa.com>
<20051216052025.GB691@filer>
<43A2CCEF.9030605@kylecordes.com>
On 12/16/05, Kyle Cordes <kyle@kylecordes.com> wrote:
> Kevin Brown wrote:
>
> >Craig A. James wrote:
> >
> >
> >>Hints are dangerous, and I consider them a last resort.
> >>
> >>
> >
> >If you consider them a last resort, then why do you consider them to
> >be a better alternative than a workaround such as turning off
> >enable_seqscan, when all the other tradeoffs are considered?
> >
> >
>
> I would like a bit finer degree of control on this - I'd like to be able
> to tell PG that for my needs, it is never OK to scan an entire table of
> more than N rows. I'd typically set N to 1,000,000 or so. What I would
> really like is for my DBMS to give me a little more pushback - I'd like
> to ask it to run a query, and have it either find a "good" way to run
> the query, or politely refuse to run it at all.
>
> Yes, I know that is an unusual request :-)
>
> The context is this - in a busy OLTP system, sometimes a query comes
> through that, for whatever reason (foolishness on my part as a
> developer, unexpected use by a user, imperfection of the optimizer,
> etc.), takes a really long time to run, usually because it table-scans
> one or more large tables. If several of these happen at once, it can
> grind an important production system effectively to a halt. I'd like to
> have a few users/operations get a "sorry, I couldn't find a good way to
> do that" message, rather than all the users find that their system has
> effectively stopped working.
>
> Kyle Cordes
> www.kylecordes.com
>
>
set statement_timeout in postgresql.conf
--
Atentamente,
Jaime Casanova
(DBA: DataBase Aniquilator ;)
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Reply to all the recipients using the --to and --cc options:
reply via email
To: pgsql-performance@postgresql.org
Cc: systemguards@gmail.com, kyle@kylecordes.com
Subject: Re: Overriding the optimizer
In-Reply-To: <c2d9e70e0512160645q20ca27b7ja2f1235bed797747@mail.gmail.com>
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
This inbox is served by DDX for PostgreSQL; see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox