From: Francisco Reyes <lists@stringsutils.com>
To: Scott Marlowe <scott.marlowe@gmail.com>
Cc: Pgsql performance <pgsql-performance@postgresql.org>
Subject: Re: 10K vs 15k rpm for analytics
Date: Tue, 02 Mar 2010 16:30:29 -0500
Message-ID: <cone.1267565429.453229.32557.1000@shelca> (raw)
References: <cone.1267562557.293175.32557.1000@shelca>
<dcc563d11003021312k57e9c558n177e10ad16ab32b1@mail.gmail.com>
Scott Marlowe writes:
> Then the real thing to compare is the speed of the drives for
> throughput not rpm.
In a machine, simmilar to what I plan to buy, already in house 24 x 10K rpm
gives me about 400MB/sec while 16 x 15K rpm (2 to 3 year old drives) gives
me about 500MB/sec
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Reply to all the recipients using the --to and --cc options:
reply via email
To: pgsql-performance@postgresql.org
Cc: lists@stringsutils.com, scott.marlowe@gmail.com
Subject: Re: 10K vs 15k rpm for analytics
In-Reply-To: <cone.1267565429.453229.32557.1000@shelca>
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
This inbox is served by DDX for PostgreSQL; see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox