From: Scott Marlowe <scott.marlowe@gmail.com>
To: Dennis Muhlestein <djmuhlestein@gmail.com>
Cc: pgsql-performance@postgresql.org
Subject: Re: Possible Redundancy/Performance Solution
Date: Tue, 6 May 2008 19:57:53 -0600
Message-ID: <dcc563d10805061857i5908c269q4d2c5cecd78a8788@mail.gmail.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <fvqj5j$5v5$1@news.hub.org>
References: <fvq189$2ej4$1@news.hub.org>
<Pine.GSO.4.64.0805061316340.3589@westnet.com>
<fvq854$ocq$1@news.hub.org>
<Pine.GSO.4.64.0805061625150.11474@westnet.com>
<fvqj5j$5v5$1@news.hub.org>
On Tue, May 6, 2008 at 3:39 PM, Dennis Muhlestein
<djmuhlestein@gmail.com> wrote:
> Those are good points. So you'd go ahead and add the pgpool in front (or
> another redundancy approach, but then use raid1,5 or perhaps 10 on each
> server?
That's what I'd do. specificall RAID10 for small to medium drive sets
used for transactional stuff, and RAID6 for very large reporting
databases that are mostly read.
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Reply to all the recipients using the --to and --cc options:
reply via email
To: pgsql-performance@postgresql.org
Cc: scott.marlowe@gmail.com, djmuhlestein@gmail.com
Subject: Re: Possible Redundancy/Performance Solution
In-Reply-To: <dcc563d10805061857i5908c269q4d2c5cecd78a8788@mail.gmail.com>
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
This inbox is served by DDX for PostgreSQL; see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox