From: Lew <noone@lewscanon.com>
To: pgsql-performance@postgresql.org
Subject: Re: Big difference in time returned by EXPLAIN ANALYZE SELECT ... AND SELECT ...
Date: Mon, 26 Jul 2010 19:03:58 -0400
Message-ID: <i2l48k$okj$1@news.albasani.net> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <4C4D5BE9.6040808@postnewspapers.com.au>
References: <AANLkTinHPkEDijSHbxY3KxygO2SWy6XMPLvn=CvnWdG8@mail.gmail.com>
<4C4D5220.9010101@postnewspapers.com.au>
<4C4D547E.50905@gmail.com>
<4C4D5BE9.6040808@postnewspapers.com.au>
Piotr Gasidło wrote:
>>>> EXPLAIN ANALYZE SELECT ...
>>>> Total runtime: 4.782 ms
>>>> Time: 25,970 ms
Vitalii Tymchyshyn wrote:
>> Actually it's 20ms, so I suspect your point about planning time is correct.
Craig Ringer wrote:
> Oh, a commas-as-fraction-separator locale.
>
> That makes sense. Thanks for the catch.
Strangely, the runtime is shown with a period for the separator, though.
--
Lew
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Reply to all the recipients using the --to and --cc options:
reply via email
To: pgsql-performance@postgresql.org
Cc: noone@lewscanon.com
Subject: Re: Big difference in time returned by EXPLAIN ANALYZE SELECT ... AND SELECT ...
In-Reply-To: <i2l48k$okj$1@news.albasani.net>
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
This inbox is served by DDX for PostgreSQL; see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox