From: PFC <lists@boutiquenumerique.com>
To: Greg Stark <gsstark@mit.edu>
To: Josh Berkus <josh@agliodbs.com>
Cc: pgsql-performance@postgresql.org
Subject: Re: What needs to be done for real Partitioning?
Date: Sun, 20 Mar 2005 11:20:23 +0100
Message-ID: <op.snxln9r7th1vuj@localhost> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <87br9ehmja.fsf@stark.xeocode.com>
References: <200503191202.38089.josh@agliodbs.com>
<87br9ehmja.fsf@stark.xeocode.com>
> It would also be reasonable to allow clustering individual partitions;
> creating table or column constraints on some partitions and not others;
I have a session mamagement which works like that, using views now.
sessions.online is a table of the online sessions. It has a UNIQUE on
user_id.
sessions.archive contains all the closed sessions. Obviously it does not
have a UNIQUE on user_id.
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Reply to all the recipients using the --to and --cc options:
reply via email
To: pgsql-performance@postgresql.org
Cc: lists@boutiquenumerique.com, gsstark@mit.edu, josh@agliodbs.com
Subject: Re: What needs to be done for real Partitioning?
In-Reply-To: <op.snxln9r7th1vuj@localhost>
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
This inbox is served by DDX for PostgreSQL; see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox