From: PFC <lists@boutiquenumerique.com>
To: Ron Peacetree <rjpeace@earthlink.net>
To: pgsql-performance@postgresql.org
Subject: Re: Advice on RAID card
Date: Sat, 24 Sep 2005 18:27:36 +0200
Message-ID: <op.sxl70aadth1vuj@localhost> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <5559818.1127577353936.JavaMail.root@elwamui-hound.atl.sa.earthlink.net>
References: <5559818.1127577353936.JavaMail.root@elwamui-hound.atl.sa.earthlink.net>
> It looks like a rebranded low end Adaptec 64MB PCI-X <-> SATA RAID card.
> Looks like the 64MB buffer is not upgradable.
> Looks like it's SATA, not SATA II
Yeah, that's exactly what it is. I can get one for 150 Euro, the Areca is
at least 600. This is for a budget server so while it would be nice to
have all the high-tech stuff, it's not the point. My question was raher,
is it one of the crap RAID5 cards which are actually SLOWER than plain IDE
disks, or is it decent, even though low-end (and cheap), and worth it
compared to software RAID5 ?
> Assuming you are not building 1U boxes, get one of the full height
> cards and order it with the maximum size buffer you can afford.
> The cards take 1 SODIMM, so that will be a max of 1GB or 2GB
> depending on whether 2GB SODIMMs are available to you yet.
It's for a budget dev server which should have RAID5 for reliability, but
not necessarily stellar performance (and price). I asked about this card
because I can get one at a good price.
Thanks for taking the time to answer.
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Reply to all the recipients using the --to and --cc options:
reply via email
To: pgsql-performance@postgresql.org
Cc: lists@boutiquenumerique.com, rjpeace@earthlink.net
Subject: Re: Advice on RAID card
In-Reply-To: <op.sxl70aadth1vuj@localhost>
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
This inbox is served by DDX for PostgreSQL; see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox