From: PFC <lists@peufeu.com>
To: Chris <dmagick@gmail.com>
Cc: pgsql-performance@postgresql.org
Subject: Re: Postgres Benchmark Results
Date: Mon, 28 May 2007 08:41:51 +0200
Message-ID: <op.ts0x71w7cigqcu@apollo13> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <465A522C.4030701@gmail.com>
References: <op.tsmrv71ecigqcu@apollo13>
<87hcq5l1c7.fsf@oxford.xeocode.com>
<op.tsp3u1becigqcu@apollo13>
<465A522C.4030701@gmail.com>
On Mon, 28 May 2007 05:53:16 +0200, Chris <dmagick@gmail.com> wrote:
>
>> I am re-running it with other tuning, notably cost-based vacuum
>> delay and less frequent checkpoints, and it is a *lot* smoother.
>> These take a full night to run, so I'll post more results when I
>> have usefull stuff to show.
>> This has proven to be a very interesting trip to benchmarkland...
>
> [ rather late in my reply but I had to ]
>
> Are you tuning mysql in a similar fashion ?
Well, the tuning knobs are different, there are no check points or
vacuum... but yes I tried to tune MySQL too, but the hardest part was
simply making it work without deadlocking continuously.
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Reply to all the recipients using the --to and --cc options:
reply via email
To: pgsql-performance@postgresql.org
Cc: lists@peufeu.com, dmagick@gmail.com
Subject: Re: Postgres Benchmark Results
In-Reply-To: <op.ts0x71w7cigqcu@apollo13>
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
This inbox is served by DDX for PostgreSQL; see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox