From: Harald Fuchs <nospam@sap.com>
To: pgsql-performance@postgresql.org
Subject: Re: go for a script! / ex: PostgreSQL vs. MySQL
Date: 11 Oct 2003 12:22:42 +0200
Message-ID: <pupth43wgd.fsf@srv.protecting.net> (raw)
References: <007901c38f2b$0b585590$2802a8c0@webbased10>
<200310101034.52073.josh@agliodbs.com>
<3F86F5BB.90605@chuckie.co.uk>
<x7wubcon3h.fsf@yertle.int.kciLink.com>
<20031010225924.GC8664@perrin.nxad.com>
<1065837333.12875.1.camel@jester>
In article <camel@jester/">1065837333.12875.1.camel@jester>,
Rod Taylor <rbt@rbt.ca> writes:
>> Would anyone object to a patch that exports the blocksize via a
>> readonly GUC? Too many tunables are page dependant, which is
>> infuriating when copying configs from DB to DB. I wish pgsql had some
>> notion of percentages for values that end with a '%'.
> Rather than showing the block size, how about we change the tunables to
> be physical sizes rather than block based?
> effective_cache_size = 1.5GB
> shared_buffers = 25MB
Amen! Being forced to set config values in some obscure units rather
than bytes is an ugly braindamage which should be easy to fix.
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Reply to all the recipients using the --to and --cc options:
reply via email
To: pgsql-performance@postgresql.org
Cc: nospam@sap.com
Subject: Re: go for a script! / ex: PostgreSQL vs. MySQL
In-Reply-To: <pupth43wgd.fsf@srv.protecting.net>
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
This inbox is served by DDX for PostgreSQL; see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox