public inbox for [email protected]  
help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: Amit Khandekar <[email protected]>
To: Christoph Berg <[email protected]>
Cc: [email protected] <[email protected]>
Subject: Re: No PGDG package for ARM architecture
Date: Tue, 17 Mar 2020 17:45:46 +0530
Message-ID: <CAJ3gD9e0-0NX+MziXKhmF4-nFQRadUhcZ0UaATiuagJSBCxhjQ@mail.gmail.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <[email protected]>
References: <CAJ3gD9ezKiUgcZDjbUa4svn3A+M_r6QvgOVmarA2aoDR9i+iLA@mail.gmail.com>
	<[email protected]>
	<CAJ3gD9e2Q9MQxa3DTbS8Jo9D_3GTKrWHyzQvqRuypHBX-=uUkA@mail.gmail.com>
	<[email protected]>

On Mon, 16 Mar 2020 at 18:11, Christoph Berg <[email protected]> wrote:
>
> Re: Amit Khandekar 2020-03-16 <CAJ3gD9e2Q9MQxa3DTbS8Jo9D_3GTKrWHyzQvqRuypHBX-=uUkA@mail.gmail.com>
> > So, when we see that there are N number of OS/architecture
> > combinations for which PGDG does not provide packages, is it so
> > because we don't have dedicated machines satisfying the minumum
> > requirements like RAM/core/disk ? In other words, is it only a matter
> > of providing such machine and adding it up in the buildfarm members
> > where it passes the regression tests, or there are are some more
> > requirements over and above the machine resource requirements after
> > which PGDG can officially support those OS/architecture combinations ?
>
> The buildfarm machines have nothing to do with the build daemons
> behind apt.postgresql.org or yum.postgresql.org; they are entirely
> different infrastructure.

Ok.

>
> I guess asking the buildfarm operators if they can spare machines as
> build daemons might work, but I haven't had the time to dig into that.
> If you care about a specific architecture, it would be nice if you
> could arrange that.

I just checked; it is possible for me to arrange for an aarch64 VM
with the configuration you mentioned :
> Are you able to provide a build host for arm64? Specs would be
> something like >= 8 cores, 8 GB of RAM, 100 GB disk, root access.





view thread (7+ messages)  latest in thread

reply

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Reply to all the recipients using the --to and --cc options:
  reply via email

  To: [email protected]
  Cc: [email protected], [email protected], [email protected]
  Subject: Re: No PGDG package for ARM architecture
  In-Reply-To: <CAJ3gD9e0-0NX+MziXKhmF4-nFQRadUhcZ0UaATiuagJSBCxhjQ@mail.gmail.com>

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

This inbox is served by agora; see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox