public inbox for [email protected]
help / color / mirror / Atom feedSwitching to c-ares for pgbouncer?
4+ messages / 2 participants
[nested] [flat]
* Switching to c-ares for pgbouncer?
@ 2016-07-12 15:09 Devrim Gündüz <[email protected]>
2016-07-12 15:14 ` Re: Switching to c-ares for pgbouncer? Jeff Frost <[email protected]>
0 siblings, 1 reply; 4+ messages in thread
From: Devrim Gündüz @ 2016-07-12 15:09 UTC (permalink / raw)
To: pgsql-pkg-yum
Hi,
I was reading this:
https://redmine.postgresql.org/issues/1444
Any objections for switching to c-ares for pgbouncer? From packaging point of
view, I confirmed that c-ares is available for all supported distros, but I'm
not sure about the implications.
Regards,
--
Devrim GÜNDÜZ
Principal Systems Engineer @ EnterpriseDB: http://www.enterprisedb.com
PostgreSQL Danışmanı/Consultant, Red Hat Certified Engineer
Twitter: @DevrimGunduz , @DevrimGunduzTR
Attachments:
[application/pgp-signature] signature.asc (819B, 2-signature.asc)
download
^ permalink raw reply [nested|flat] 4+ messages in thread
* Re: Switching to c-ares for pgbouncer?
2016-07-12 15:09 Switching to c-ares for pgbouncer? Devrim Gündüz <[email protected]>
@ 2016-07-12 15:14 ` Jeff Frost <[email protected]>
2016-07-12 15:31 ` Re: Switching to c-ares for pgbouncer? Devrim Gündüz <[email protected]>
0 siblings, 1 reply; 4+ messages in thread
From: Jeff Frost @ 2016-07-12 15:14 UTC (permalink / raw)
To: Devrim GÜNDÜZ <[email protected]>; +Cc: pgsql-pkg-yum
> On Jul 12, 2016, at 8:09 AM, Devrim Gündüz <[email protected]> wrote:
>
>
> Hi,
>
> I was reading this:
>
> https://redmine.postgresql.org/issues/1444
>
> Any objections for switching to c-ares for pgbouncer? From packaging point of
> view, I confirmed that c-ares is available for all supported distros, but I'm
> not sure about the implications.
If the chart is to be believed, the only issue is:
ipv6+CNAME buggy in <=1.10
Do you know which versions are standard in the supported distros these days?
--
Sent via pgsql-pkg-yum mailing list ([email protected])
To make changes to your subscription:
http://www.postgresql.org/mailpref/pgsql-pkg-yum
^ permalink raw reply [nested|flat] 4+ messages in thread
* Re: Switching to c-ares for pgbouncer?
2016-07-12 15:09 Switching to c-ares for pgbouncer? Devrim Gündüz <[email protected]>
2016-07-12 15:14 ` Re: Switching to c-ares for pgbouncer? Jeff Frost <[email protected]>
@ 2016-07-12 15:31 ` Devrim Gündüz <[email protected]>
2016-07-12 15:32 ` Re: Switching to c-ares for pgbouncer? Jeff Frost <[email protected]>
0 siblings, 1 reply; 4+ messages in thread
From: Devrim Gündüz @ 2016-07-12 15:31 UTC (permalink / raw)
To: Jeff Frost <[email protected]>; +Cc: pgsql-pkg-yum
Hi Jeff,
On Tue, 2016-07-12 at 08:14 -0700, Jeff Frost wrote:
> If the chart is to be believed, the only issue is:
>
> ipv6+CNAME buggy in <=1.10
>
> Do you know which versions are standard in the supported distros these days?
RHEL 5: 1.6.0
RHEL 6, RHEL 7, Fedora 22, Fedora 23: 1.10.0
Fedora 24, rawhide: 1.11.0
Quick note: Even though CNAME+IPv6 is buggy, that feature even does not exist
in libevent (at least this is what I understand from the chart ("ipv4 only")),
so we are not introducing new bugs here.
Regards,
--
Devrim GÜNDÜZ
Principal Systems Engineer @ EnterpriseDB: http://www.enterprisedb.com
PostgreSQL Danışmanı/Consultant, Red Hat Certified Engineer
Twitter: @DevrimGunduz , @DevrimGunduzTR
Attachments:
[application/pgp-signature] signature.asc (819B, 2-signature.asc)
download
^ permalink raw reply [nested|flat] 4+ messages in thread
* Re: Switching to c-ares for pgbouncer?
2016-07-12 15:09 Switching to c-ares for pgbouncer? Devrim Gündüz <[email protected]>
2016-07-12 15:14 ` Re: Switching to c-ares for pgbouncer? Jeff Frost <[email protected]>
2016-07-12 15:31 ` Re: Switching to c-ares for pgbouncer? Devrim Gündüz <[email protected]>
@ 2016-07-12 15:32 ` Jeff Frost <[email protected]>
0 siblings, 0 replies; 4+ messages in thread
From: Jeff Frost @ 2016-07-12 15:32 UTC (permalink / raw)
To: Devrim GÜNDÜZ <[email protected]>; +Cc: pgsql-pkg-yum
> On Jul 12, 2016, at 8:31 AM, Devrim Gündüz <[email protected]> wrote:
>
>
> Hi Jeff,
>
> On Tue, 2016-07-12 at 08:14 -0700, Jeff Frost wrote:
>> If the chart is to be believed, the only issue is:
>>
>> ipv6+CNAME buggy in <=1.10
>>
>> Do you know which versions are standard in the supported distros these days?
>
> RHEL 5: 1.6.0
> RHEL 6, RHEL 7, Fedora 22, Fedora 23: 1.10.0
> Fedora 24, rawhide: 1.11.0
>
> Quick note: Even though CNAME+IPv6 is buggy, that feature even does not exist
> in libevent (at least this is what I understand from the chart ("ipv4 only")),
> so we are not introducing new bugs here.
Sounds like at least nobody could be using ipv6 with cnames on the current setup, so I agree, it seems fine.
--
Sent via pgsql-pkg-yum mailing list ([email protected])
To make changes to your subscription:
http://www.postgresql.org/mailpref/pgsql-pkg-yum
^ permalink raw reply [nested|flat] 4+ messages in thread
end of thread, other threads:[~2016-07-12 15:32 UTC | newest]
Thread overview: 4+ messages (download: mbox mbox.gz follow: Atom feed)
-- links below jump to the message on this page --
2016-07-12 15:09 Switching to c-ares for pgbouncer? Devrim Gündüz <[email protected]>
2016-07-12 15:14 ` Jeff Frost <[email protected]>
2016-07-12 15:31 ` Devrim Gündüz <[email protected]>
2016-07-12 15:32 ` Jeff Frost <[email protected]>
This inbox is served by agora; see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox