pg.ddx.io pgsql-sql@postgresql.org mailing list archivehelp / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: Scott Marlowe <smarlowe@g2switchworks.com>
To: Jan Wieck <JanWieck@Yahoo.com>
Cc: Kenneth Gonsalves <lawgon@thenilgiris.com>
Cc: PostgreSQL SQL <pgsql-sql@postgresql.org>
Subject: Re: why vacuum
Date: Wed, 26 Oct 2005 11:10:27 -0500
Message-ID: <1130343027.2872.20.camel@state.g2switchworks.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <435FAA21.3070400@Yahoo.com>
References: <200510261015.17623.lawgon@thenilgiris.com>
<1130339980.2872.12.camel@state.g2switchworks.com>
<435FAA21.3070400@Yahoo.com>
On Wed, 2005-10-26 at 11:09, Jan Wieck wrote:
> On 10/26/2005 11:19 AM, Scott Marlowe wrote:
>
> > On Tue, 2005-10-25 at 23:45, Kenneth Gonsalves wrote:
> >> hi,
> >> i was in a minor flame war with a mysql guy - his major grouse was that
> >> 'I wouldnt commit mission critical data to a database that needs to be
> >> vacuumed once a week'. So why does pg need vacuum?
> >
> > Oh man oh man. After reading the article, I realized he was saying that
> > he wouldn't trust PostgreSQL to replace Oracle. He apparently wouldn't
> > trust MySQL to replace oracle either.
> >
> > But, the next time someone says that slony is a toy add on, and MySQL
> > has REAL replication, point them to THIS page on the same blog:
> >
> > http://ebergen.net/wordpress/?p=70
> >
>
> You must have missed the FAQ and other side notes about replication in
> the MySQL manual. Essentially MySQL replication is nothing but a query
> duplicating system, with the added sugar of taking care of now() and
> some other non-deterministic things, but not all of them.
>
> Non-deterministic user defined procedures, functions and triggers will
> simply blow MySQL's sophisticated replication apart.
True, but I never expected a CTRL-C to the mysql command line to break
replication. Even for MySQL's lackadaisical behaviour, that's pretty
far out.
view thread (25+ messages) latest in thread
Message-ID: <1130343027.2872.20.camel@state.g2switchworks.com> Permalink: ../1130343027.2872.20.camel@state.g2switchworks.com/ Also on: postgresql.org/message-id/1130343027.2872.20.camel@state.g2switchworks.com ·
reply
Reply instructions: You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email using any one of the following methods: * Reply to all the recipients using the --to and --cc options: reply via email To: pgsql-sql@postgresql.org Cc: smarlowe@g2switchworks.com, JanWieck@Yahoo.com, lawgon@thenilgiris.com Subject: Re: why vacuum In-Reply-To: <1130343027.2872.20.camel@state.g2switchworks.com> * Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client, and reply-to-all from there: mbox
This inbox is served by DDX for PostgreSQL; see mirroring instructions for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox