From: Tom Lane <tgl@sss.pgh.pa.us>
To: Martin Marques <martin@marquesminen.com.ar>
Cc: Rodrigo De León <rdeleonp@gmail.com>
Cc: PostgreSQL SQL List <pgsql-sql@postgresql.org>
Subject: Re: PL argument max size, and doubt
Date: Wed, 21 Nov 2007 13:05:26 -0500
Message-ID: <14547.1195668326@sss.pgh.pa.us> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <47446F13.3090003@marquesminen.com.ar>
References: <4744313C.40107@marquesminen.com.ar>
<a55915760711210729t7d255de2kf0abc309ffd84ccc@mail.gmail.com>
<47446F13.3090003@marquesminen.com.ar>
Martin Marques <martin@marquesminen.com.ar> writes:
> Rodrigo De León escribió:
>> "In any case, the longest possible character string that can be stored
>> is about 1 GB."
>>
> I was asking about the limit in the argument. Is it the same as the
> limits the types have in table definition?
Yeah, ultimately this is a palloc() restriction on the size of any one
data value.
> I have always heard that modification queries should be EXECUTED in PL.
> AFAICR.
Run far away from whatever source gave you that advice...
regards, tom lane
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Reply to all the recipients using the --to and --cc options:
reply via email
To: pgsql-sql@postgresql.org
Cc: tgl@sss.pgh.pa.us, martin@marquesminen.com.ar, rdeleonp@gmail.com
Subject: Re: PL argument max size, and doubt
In-Reply-To: <14547.1195668326@sss.pgh.pa.us>
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
This inbox is served by DDX for PostgreSQL; see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox