From: Martin Marques <martin@marquesminen.com.ar>
To: Tom Lane <tgl@sss.pgh.pa.us>
Cc: Rodrigo De León <rdeleonp@gmail.com>
Cc: PostgreSQL SQL List <pgsql-sql@postgresql.org>
Subject: Re: PL argument max size, and doubt
Date: Fri, 23 Nov 2007 07:37:24 -0300
Message-ID: <4746AD64.8090209@marquesminen.com.ar> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <23159.1195800021@sss.pgh.pa.us>
References: <4744313C.40107@marquesminen.com.ar>
<a55915760711210729t7d255de2kf0abc309ffd84ccc@mail.gmail.com>
<47446F13.3090003@marquesminen.com.ar>
<14547.1195668326@sss.pgh.pa.us>
<4745F67B.7050800@marquesminen.com.ar>
<23159.1195800021@sss.pgh.pa.us>
Tom Lane escribió:
> Martin Marques <martin@marquesminen.com.ar> writes:
>> Tom Lane escribió:
>>> Martin Marques <martin@marquesminen.com.ar> writes:
>>>> I have always heard that modification queries should be EXECUTED in PL.
>>>> AFAICR.
>>> Run far away from whatever source gave you that advice...
>
>> Sorry, it was with DDL commands.
>
> That's not much better ;-). DDL commands don't have plans, so there's
> not anything that could be invalidated. I don't see any reason to use
> an EXECUTE unless there's an actual textual change in the command you
> need to execute.
Well, actually....
http://archives.postgresql.org/pgsql-sql/2007-02/msg00214.php
See the follow-ups
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Reply to all the recipients using the --to and --cc options:
reply via email
To: pgsql-sql@postgresql.org
Cc: martin@marquesminen.com.ar, tgl@sss.pgh.pa.us, rdeleonp@gmail.com
Subject: Re: PL argument max size, and doubt
In-Reply-To: <4746AD64.8090209@marquesminen.com.ar>
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
This inbox is served by DDX for PostgreSQL; see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox