From: Tom Lane <tgl@sss.pgh.pa.us>
To: josh@agliodbs.com
Cc: Michael Glaesmann <grzm@myrealbox.com>
Cc: pgsql-sql@postgresql.org
Subject: Re: Expressional Indexes
Date: Wed, 22 Oct 2003 15:44:58 -0400
Message-ID: <18349.1066851898@sss.pgh.pa.us> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <200310221239.58302.josh@agliodbs.com>
References: <7141E2A2-04BE-11D8-81AE-0005029FC1A7@myrealbox.com>
<18109.1066850278@sss.pgh.pa.us>
<200310221239.58302.josh@agliodbs.com>
Josh Berkus <josh@agliodbs.com> writes:
>> I'm not particularly happy with the phrase "expressional index", and
>> would like to think of something else to use before the 7.4 docs go
>> final. Any ideas?
> Hmmm ... well, actually, I like "Expressional Indexes". What's wrong
> with it?
Mainly that "expressional" is a made-up word.
I have been considering using "calculated index" or "computed index"
but dunno if that really conveys anything.
regards, tom lane
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Reply to all the recipients using the --to and --cc options:
reply via email
To: pgsql-sql@postgresql.org
Cc: tgl@sss.pgh.pa.us, josh@agliodbs.com, grzm@myrealbox.com
Subject: Re: Expressional Indexes
In-Reply-To: <18349.1066851898@sss.pgh.pa.us>
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
This inbox is served by DDX for PostgreSQL; see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox