From: Josh Berkus <josh@agliodbs.com>
To: Tom Lane <tgl@sss.pgh.pa.us>
To: Michael Glaesmann <grzm@myrealbox.com>
Cc: pgsql-sql@postgresql.org
Subject: Re: Expressional Indexes
Date: Wed, 22 Oct 2003 12:39:58 -0700
Message-ID: <200310221239.58302.josh@agliodbs.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <18109.1066850278@sss.pgh.pa.us>
References: <7141E2A2-04BE-11D8-81AE-0005029FC1A7@myrealbox.com>
<18109.1066850278@sss.pgh.pa.us>
Tom,
Jumping lists, NOVICE is unlikely to have an opinion about this.
> I'm not particularly happy with the phrase "expressional index", and
> would like to think of something else to use before the 7.4 docs go
> final. Any ideas?
Hmmm ... well, actually, I like "Expressional Indexes". What's wrong with it?
--
-Josh Berkus
Aglio Database Solutions
San Francisco
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Reply to all the recipients using the --to and --cc options:
reply via email
To: pgsql-sql@postgresql.org
Cc: josh@agliodbs.com, tgl@sss.pgh.pa.us, grzm@myrealbox.com
Subject: Re: Expressional Indexes
In-Reply-To: <200310221239.58302.josh@agliodbs.com>
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
This inbox is served by DDX for PostgreSQL; see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox