From: Bruce Momjian <pgman@candle.pha.pa.us>
To: Tom Lane <tgl@sss.pgh.pa.us>
Cc: Christopher Kings-Lynne <chriskl@familyhealth.com.au>
Cc: pgsql-sql@postgresql.org
Subject: Re: Bug with dump/restore when using UNION and ORDER BY in views
Date: Sun, 4 Aug 2002 01:54:08 -0400 (EDT)
Message-ID: <200208040554.g745s8H02748@candle.pha.pa.us> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <7639.1028439037@sss.pgh.pa.us>
What is in the 7.2.X CVS that we would want to release?
---------------------------------------------------------------------------
Tom Lane wrote:
> "Christopher Kings-Lynne" <chriskl@familyhealth.com.au> writes:
> >> Yeah. This is fixed in current sources, and I back-patched it into
> >> the REL7_2 branch, but current plans don't seem to include a 7.2.2
> >> release --- we'll be going straight to 7.3 beta instead.
>
> > Is it worth doing a 7.2.2 patch that will dump people's foreign keys as
> > ALTER TABLE/ADD FOREIGN KEY instead of a bunch of CREATE CONSTRAINT
> > TRIGGERs, so that they actually become constraints in 7.3?
>
> I don't think it's any easier to do that as a backpatch than as new
> functionality in 7.3 pg_dump. As far as the general issue of a 7.2.2
> release goes, I'm personally in favor of one --- there are several
> important bugfixes in the 7.2 branch right now --- but I don't do the
> gruntwork for patch releases, so I can't complain too much.
>
> > Also Tom - did you check if you can CREATE CONSTRAINT TRIGGER on a dropped
> > column - I think I neglected to look at that in the patch I submitted
> > originally.
>
> I'm pretty sure that won't get past the ATTNAME cache patches, but try
> it...
>
> regards, tom lane
>
> ---------------------------(end of broadcast)---------------------------
> TIP 5: Have you checked our extensive FAQ?
>
> http://www.postgresql.org/users-lounge/docs/faq.html
>
--
Bruce Momjian | http://candle.pha.pa.us
pgman@candle.pha.pa.us | (610) 853-3000
+ If your life is a hard drive, | 830 Blythe Avenue
+ Christ can be your backup. | Drexel Hill, Pennsylvania 19026
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Reply to all the recipients using the --to and --cc options:
reply via email
To: pgsql-sql@postgresql.org
Cc: pgman@candle.pha.pa.us, tgl@sss.pgh.pa.us, chriskl@familyhealth.com.au
Subject: Re: Bug with dump/restore when using UNION and ORDER BY in views
In-Reply-To: <200208040554.g745s8H02748@candle.pha.pa.us>
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
This inbox is served by DDX for PostgreSQL; see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox