From: Magnus Enbom <dot@rockstorm.se>
To: Bruce Momjian <pgman@candle.pha.pa.us>
Cc: PostgreSQL-development <pgsql-hackers@postgreSQL.org>
Subject: Re: [SQL] LIMIT 1 FOR UPDATE or FOR UPDATE LIMIT 1?
Date: Wed, 28 Aug 2002 10:28:41 +0200
Message-ID: <20020828102841.A23539@ford.rockstorm.se> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <200208280245.g7S2jO803463@candle.pha.pa.us>
References: <GNELIHDDFBOCMGBFGEFOMEOMCDAA.chriskl@familyhealth.com.au>
<200208280245.g7S2jO803463@candle.pha.pa.us>
On Tue, Aug 27, 2002 at 10:45:24PM -0400, Bruce Momjian wrote:
>
> OK, patch attached. It was actually easier than I thought. We have to
> decide if we are going to remove the old syntax in 7.4.
>
> Regression tests pass. No doc updates yet.
Thanks alot! I don't mind keeping the old syntax.
-- M
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Reply to all the recipients using the --to and --cc options:
reply via email
To: pgsql-sql@postgresql.org
Cc: dot@rockstorm.se, pgman@candle.pha.pa.us, pgsql-hackers@postgreSQL.org
Subject: Re: [SQL] LIMIT 1 FOR UPDATE or FOR UPDATE LIMIT 1?
In-Reply-To: <20020828102841.A23539@ford.rockstorm.se>
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
This inbox is served by DDX for PostgreSQL; see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox